Love is ….
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Not lust nor envy nor... what ever sick fetish one may have. None of that is Love.
No doubt, but we also need a good 5 word t-shirt capable catchphrase to poke the medullas of all the sleepers in tard jail!
😅
Ah, I should add the reference to that verse though!
Matthew 5:28 - https://www.bible.com/bible/59/mat.5.28 Job 31:1 - https://www.bible.com/bible/59/job.31.1 Genesis 2:25 - https://www.bible.com/bible/59/GEN.2.ESV
Maybe it needs some reworking?
The point I was going at, for the sleeping kids in the back of the class, is that this “love is love” phrase they’re using is really stupid, and it’s trying to break the spell, not by pointing them in the right direction (which it might should do as well to meet the Alinsky postulate of “the cost of a successful attack is a constructive alternative”), but by pointing out what they’re actually saying, and flipping it to “NOT that”.
u/fknright u/tweety51a
I’m not against V.2’s of memes if it ups the potency!
Ah gotcha. Yes I cite that verse all the time too. Actually run through each attribute of it as a checklist when testing to try and see if I’m actually being loving when I say so, or if I’m just fooling myself and others.
Reply Hazy, Try Again Later. 😁
I agree with your intent.
Isn’t it awesome how that intent can take 140 words to explain, or 5 words and a scribble to explain as a picture?
I think adding the verse might fix the ambiguity on direction, but it would also have the effect of trying to hit sleeping degenerates with scripture, which they mostly reject and might reduce the fallacy exposure, so…
Scripture addition would be ok in a heretical “love is love” supporting church.
Lust isn’t love. Lust is self serving.