No, that's a reason to go after them FIRST, to stop them further interfering in the governance of other nations. You don't delay treating the stage 4 cancer because you want to biopsy some suspicious spots on your skin first.
Say you are a king, and you have dukes and lords, and they have considerable power.
Say you know that Duke A is the ring-leader for taking your throne. Do you go after him directly? No, you have to shut down his power structure first. When he has no money, no friends, no allies, no troops, then you move in and shut him down for good. So you get to work doing what he was doing, but in reverse.
These things take time, and you can't rush it. Play your hand too early, you risk losing permanently.
another reason why they're being saved for last. NCSWIC!
No, that's a reason to go after them FIRST, to stop them further interfering in the governance of other nations. You don't delay treating the stage 4 cancer because you want to biopsy some suspicious spots on your skin first.
It doesn't work like that in real life, though.
Say you are a king, and you have dukes and lords, and they have considerable power.
Say you know that Duke A is the ring-leader for taking your throne. Do you go after him directly? No, you have to shut down his power structure first. When he has no money, no friends, no allies, no troops, then you move in and shut him down for good. So you get to work doing what he was doing, but in reverse.
These things take time, and you can't rush it. Play your hand too early, you risk losing permanently.