FDA ruling on ectasy for PTSD is a bad trip for suffering patients - The Great Awakening

FDA ruling on ectasy for PTSD is a bad trip for suffering patients (www.washingtonpost.com)

posted 100 days ago by pepperonishoes 100 days ago by pepperonishoes +18 / -0

Opinion | FDA ruling on ectasy for PTSD is a bad trip for suffering patients

An overly narrow approach to medicine stands in the way of a powerful breakthrough in treating the disease.

25 comments

25 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (25)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– Bia2020 1 point 100 days ago +1 / -0

Thread about an article on ecstasy for ptsd, then someone mentioned ayahuasca, that's what I responded to

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– UltraMagaOK 1 point 100 days ago +1 / -0

Sure and your knee jerk response had no good information about ayahuasca and PTSD. "Demons, mang."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5895707/\

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38059941/

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Bia2020 1 point 100 days ago +1 / -0

Ironic that your own response is so triggered by my use of the word "demons" that you feel the need to ignore everything else I said. It's wrong to convince those suffering with ptsd symptoms that they have to travel out of the country for good help. Period. I'm not going to keep arguing that fact. Have a good day.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– UltraMagaOK 1 point 100 days ago +1 / -0

I don't think anyone tried to do that. It is an option. That's all that was said.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q