Neil Gorsuch voted as part of the 4, not because he thinks that Title IX should allow non-women into women’s sports, but only because he thinks that the injunction blocks other parts of Title IX that not necessarily need to be blocked. . His vote was kind of technical, from a judicial philosophy that he should only uphold a part of the injunction from the lower court, and not the entire lower court injunction. He thought the injunction was too broad and that limiting the administrations’ policy could have been done differently, more narrowly. So he will be solid against the new “policy” added to Title IX, at this stage of hearing the injunction he can afford to cast his vote this particular way that seemingly makes it look like he sides with the administration, even though he really doesn’t agree with the 3 who want non-women to be able to participate in women’s sports.
Good news, but why only 5-4?
Neil Gorsuch voted as part of the 4, not because he thinks that Title IX should allow non-women into women’s sports, but only because he thinks that the injunction blocks other parts of Title IX that not necessarily need to be blocked. . His vote was kind of technical, from a judicial philosophy that he should only uphold a part of the injunction from the lower court, and not the entire lower court injunction. He thought the injunction was too broad and that limiting the administrations’ policy could have been done differently, more narrowly. So he will be solid against the new “policy” added to Title IX, at this stage of hearing the injunction he can afford to cast his vote this particular way that seemingly makes it look like he sides with the administration, even though he really doesn’t agree with the 3 who want non-women to be able to participate in women’s sports.
A VERY Good Interpretation on what SC Gorsuch did and also...IT IS VERRRRY Machiavellian BY same!!!!