IDK what PDW is but full transparency: I followed the link from Godlike Productions.
As I said, “Interdasting,” did not say I believe it. But to clarify MY meaning, (and no one else’s), what I find interesting is the backlash/doubt being cast upon Candace Owens within a week of her convo with Ye, who was also discredited following his outspokenness about (((them))).
Again, I neither confirm or deny the video’s claims; merely found it Interdasting.
They're not quite as refined or "serious" as GA when it comes to research and what we talk about here.
The main issue is forum/topic slide and dilution of important posts that steal the exposure and attention away discussing goofy shit like stunt doubles...
Thank you for the clarification. I do find it confusing as to what is and what is not considered a slide or dilution of important posts here on GAW. I mean I see a lot of re-posts of Twitter posts, links from YouTube, Gateway Pundit, Breitbart, and American Thinker, et al, occasional links to Rumble and Bitchute, occasional personal posts, daily a number of Great Awakening memes, and even some straight up shitposts—-all of which I personally can appreciate, whether deadly serious, hysterically funny, simply amusing, highly doubtful, or (apparent) “gospel truth.” Just how is an anon to know?
Most of those MSM/X links are linked because they contain COMs. Sometimes COMs for normies, sometimes for anons and sometimes for the cabal. This is where we often look to Q drops to find out which. For instance:
I guarantee you'll learn so much you didn't know about what is really going on ... and Q and why things are the way they are here in relation to discernment will become clear.
IDK what PDW is but full transparency: I followed the link from Godlike Productions.
As I said, “Interdasting,” did not say I believe it. But to clarify MY meaning, (and no one else’s), what I find interesting is the backlash/doubt being cast upon Candace Owens within a week of her convo with Ye, who was also discredited following his outspokenness about (((them))).
Again, I neither confirm or deny the video’s claims; merely found it Interdasting.
Patriots Dot Win...
They're not quite as refined or "serious" as GA when it comes to research and what we talk about here.
The main issue is forum/topic slide and dilution of important posts that steal the exposure and attention away discussing goofy shit like stunt doubles...
Yanno...
Thank you for the clarification. I do find it confusing as to what is and what is not considered a slide or dilution of important posts here on GAW. I mean I see a lot of re-posts of Twitter posts, links from YouTube, Gateway Pundit, Breitbart, and American Thinker, et al, occasional links to Rumble and Bitchute, occasional personal posts, daily a number of Great Awakening memes, and even some straight up shitposts—-all of which I personally can appreciate, whether deadly serious, hysterically funny, simply amusing, highly doubtful, or (apparent) “gospel truth.” Just how is an anon to know?
No worries...
Most of those MSM/X links are linked because they contain COMs. Sometimes COMs for normies, sometimes for anons and sometimes for the cabal. This is where we often look to Q drops to find out which. For instance:
u/#q70
Here's some pointings for you to expand your understanding:
https://badlands.substack.com/ - Read anything and everything by Joe Lange & The Q for Dummies series is very, very good.
https://badlands.substack.com/p/q-for-dummies-chapter-1
https://badlands.substack.com/p/we-are-watching-a-movie
I guarantee you'll learn so much you didn't know about what is really going on ... and Q and why things are the way they are here in relation to discernment will become clear.
Cheers
Thank you, very much obliged!