Modern day prophet.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
what a heinous abuse of claiming logical fallacy. i literally just said you should cite it, instead of claiming the work as your own. this is supposed to be a research site. please do better. your whole position here was dishonest. pure 'holier than thou' bullshit.
Genetic logical fallacy. It doesn't matter where the information comes from. It matters whether it's accurate or inaccurate.
I built my own model from an AIP framework. I sourced the data that is input for different modes. That was my theological output model
My position is that God's word is infallible. Your position was that it isn't .
I didn't say it mattered where your information came from though.
and while you are taking one verse of scripture and interpreting it the way you like, I am taking that verse and interpreting it through scripture as a whole. You are the one ignoring parts of the Bible, not me. Check yourself.
No I'm taking several verses that I cited that say 100% with no ifs, ands, or buts.
You said not 100% (which puts you at odds with 2+ verses of God's Word)
Then when pressed you scraped up ONE example which I was happy to unpack how it was not a failed prophecy AND how about doing so You're not making God's word contain multiple errors and instead be your lack of understanding.
You don't get to tell me (falsely) that I'm ignoring multiple parts of the Bible when you believe that the Bible has errors in it. You lost the ability to stand on scripture.
I have the high ground Anakin.
IMAGINE accusing someone of ignoring scripture...
and then accusing them of not providing enough examples
as if you can just ignore that one example
absolute clown
I did not say the Bible has errors in it. I said you've interpreted in your own way which ignores the rest of the Bible.
Your own AI came up with the exact term I used, conditional.
Every way you've tried to squirm out of this has been highly dishonest, including saying that because I only used one example, it doesn't count.
Do I need to cite more than one instance where a prophet's unconditional statement did not come to pass?
No. Because the example I gave is Biblical.
Just argue honestly. you sound like a libtard, throwing around terms you don't understand.