It is a question that can keep you up at night, pondering the possibilities, is it not?
options:
She indeed is totally out of her depth.
She is in her depth, but plays a role to an ingenious Hussein Handler plan.
she is totally in her depth, as she plays her role in leading the charge tot totally destroy their system, by expanding, inflating, bumbling, running, stretching it while it bursts at the britches ....
I guess 1 would be laughable had it not been so serious. But yeah .... It would serve to show the Constitution to be an old rag fit for replacement.
2 is the the more worrying part. She clearly does not seem the one pushing the real buttons, but merely the instrument through which certain buttons are pushed. It is interesting to note how much money is being put into this.
I was looking at the Dollar/Euro exchange rate, in relation to who is in the White House. Interestingly, when a republican is in the White House, the Dollar strengthens, but when a dem is in the White House, the dollar weakens.
So, in terms of the international dimension, which is actually: global, what advantage would a strengthening dollar have for a dem? To be fair, this is not only about US trade. This is about the EURODOLLAR MARKET and what it supports.
And yes, the moment the trouble with Biden began, the dollar started to weaken, as if the market already is pricing in the inevitable: nothing can stop what is coming: the return of Trump.
Personally, I think this is the most exciting part: how do you control the opposition? By leading them yourself.
As you undoubtedly know, the playbook is always the same. Game Theory ....that sort of thing. But at the heart of it all is one basic question: how to limit the options of your opponent.
All .gov planning in this stage is dedicated to answering that question with regards to us. Hence the mandates, the " crises", the onslaught of propaganda and outright lies, the seemingly incapacity of functioning normal, wokism, etc. It is designed to limit options.
CamletoeHo may be the perfect candidate to go down with the ship.
How would the DNC benefit by choosing a brilliant candidate and then make that candidate appear like an idiot for a time?
By giving the other side a false sense of security?
It is a question that can keep you up at night, pondering the possibilities, is it not?
options:
I guess 1 would be laughable had it not been so serious. But yeah .... It would serve to show the Constitution to be an old rag fit for replacement.
2 is the the more worrying part. She clearly does not seem the one pushing the real buttons, but merely the instrument through which certain buttons are pushed. It is interesting to note how much money is being put into this.
I was looking at the Dollar/Euro exchange rate, in relation to who is in the White House. Interestingly, when a republican is in the White House, the Dollar strengthens, but when a dem is in the White House, the dollar weakens.
So, in terms of the international dimension, which is actually: global, what advantage would a strengthening dollar have for a dem? To be fair, this is not only about US trade. This is about the EURODOLLAR MARKET and what it supports.
And yes, the moment the trouble with Biden began, the dollar started to weaken, as if the market already is pricing in the inevitable: nothing can stop what is coming: the return of Trump.
As you undoubtedly know, the playbook is always the same. Game Theory ....that sort of thing. But at the heart of it all is one basic question: how to limit the options of your opponent.
All .gov planning in this stage is dedicated to answering that question with regards to us. Hence the mandates, the " crises", the onslaught of propaganda and outright lies, the seemingly incapacity of functioning normal, wokism, etc. It is designed to limit options.
CamletoeHo may be the perfect candidate to go down with the ship.
...you have a firm grasp of the situational reality...