It's long been known and accepted that Nicea was the propaganda/disinformation/misinformation of the church. What isn't is that the Roman Empire was in the beginnings of the deterioration: that deterioration had been accomplished in other 'nations' prior. While the empire lasted much longer, that which is considered the fall is of the same nature, a practice more or less perfected by Khazars. It is also the same protocol used in Germany post WWI - deterioration of morals, national tendencies, national/ethnic history and so forth, along with the takeover of the economic system. Any resistance to these leads to the destruction of the resistance. Germany is a short version, reason being that the khaz had already acquired huge power in many nations, including Germany (Weimar Republic). Rothschild was the active arm, since they had already acquired power in many nations, through economies (banking, currency printing, etc.).
Germany became an object of the khaz when the Germanic people began to resist the Roman raids of their villages for slaves and whatever wealth was available. The 'Black faces' were apparently instrumental in defeating Roman legions doing such. The slaves Rome took were used in the standard roles of the khaz - pedophilia, sacrifice and so on. That khaz dislike then became a khaz standard, leading to the intent to wipe white races from the face of "their earth". The khaz influence on the Catholic church is seen in its policies, such as declaring that the earth belongs to the church - a standard khaz belief, as stated in the talmud and koran.
~500 years after the 'Black faces', there appeared Martin Luther, a German, who dissented with the church and formed the Lutheran faction, which is entirely different from the Catholics, and that gave birth (apparently) to the others. That was another irritant to the khaz.
Note that the "church" of Rome effectively destroyed any religion based on Christ's teachings, such as the Essenes and Gnostics. Competition to the 'Synagogue of Satan' wasn't tolerated. Nicea was a part of that.
You will note that wherever khaz appeared, such as the bolsheviks, a main thrust was against anything Christian. The bolshevik revolution killed massive numbers of Russian Orthodox Christians (perhaps why Russia is now firmly Christian). The same happened with the Greek Orthodox Christians early on.
Incidentally, during the middle ages, in many European countries, jews were known as "the poisoners", who were highly skilled in that art. Some countries, apparently, forbid jewish doctors working on white patients unless a white doctor was in attendance, who had to know the jew methods of 'treatment'. That particular aspect is obvious in our present state.
Interesting stuff. I'm gonna save this comment and dig around the points when I get a chance in my backlog of things to dig
the Roman Empire was in the beginnings of the deterioration: that deterioration had been accomplished in other 'nations' prior.
Yeah, any nation which practices idolatry, especially to the degree Rome did, is destined for a fall. God did it to Israel multiple times, using pagan nations to overthrow them. What's interesting to me is that God used Babylon as the final straw to enslave Israel. However, God also promised to turn His attention upon Babylon, and recompense it for its own wickedness. Do you know of any links between the Khazars and ancient Babylon?
People keep telling me the Catholic church, who I believe to be Babylon 2.0, "Mystery Babylon", was good at the start (at transition between Pagan Rome and Papal Rome) but then was "infiltrated by Jews" or Khazars or whatever else name. I've got another comment saved on the topic but curious to see if you have found any connections to Babylon. One which stands out to me is the fact that the "Talmud" is properly called "The Babylonian Talmud" and is a collection of things Israel learned, begun practicing, teaching, during their time as captives in ancient Babylon. (not all Israelites adopted these ways, but many did)
Sorry, but based on bible modifications, I've declined to go that direction. I would, if I knew I had all the books, unmodified. Since even my own bloodline history has been shredded, I'm uncomfortable trying to assemble factual information on any of that.
My apologies for being unable to help.
Can you elaborate on the Khazar / Council of Nicea bit? I am against that council and all the ones that followed it, but thats a long story
It's long been known and accepted that Nicea was the propaganda/disinformation/misinformation of the church. What isn't is that the Roman Empire was in the beginnings of the deterioration: that deterioration had been accomplished in other 'nations' prior. While the empire lasted much longer, that which is considered the fall is of the same nature, a practice more or less perfected by Khazars. It is also the same protocol used in Germany post WWI - deterioration of morals, national tendencies, national/ethnic history and so forth, along with the takeover of the economic system. Any resistance to these leads to the destruction of the resistance. Germany is a short version, reason being that the khaz had already acquired huge power in many nations, including Germany (Weimar Republic). Rothschild was the active arm, since they had already acquired power in many nations, through economies (banking, currency printing, etc.).
Germany became an object of the khaz when the Germanic people began to resist the Roman raids of their villages for slaves and whatever wealth was available. The 'Black faces' were apparently instrumental in defeating Roman legions doing such. The slaves Rome took were used in the standard roles of the khaz - pedophilia, sacrifice and so on. That khaz dislike then became a khaz standard, leading to the intent to wipe white races from the face of "their earth". The khaz influence on the Catholic church is seen in its policies, such as declaring that the earth belongs to the church - a standard khaz belief, as stated in the talmud and koran. ~500 years after the 'Black faces', there appeared Martin Luther, a German, who dissented with the church and formed the Lutheran faction, which is entirely different from the Catholics, and that gave birth (apparently) to the others. That was another irritant to the khaz.
Note that the "church" of Rome effectively destroyed any religion based on Christ's teachings, such as the Essenes and Gnostics. Competition to the 'Synagogue of Satan' wasn't tolerated. Nicea was a part of that.
You will note that wherever khaz appeared, such as the bolsheviks, a main thrust was against anything Christian. The bolshevik revolution killed massive numbers of Russian Orthodox Christians (perhaps why Russia is now firmly Christian). The same happened with the Greek Orthodox Christians early on.
Incidentally, during the middle ages, in many European countries, jews were known as "the poisoners", who were highly skilled in that art. Some countries, apparently, forbid jewish doctors working on white patients unless a white doctor was in attendance, who had to know the jew methods of 'treatment'. That particular aspect is obvious in our present state.
Interesting stuff. I'm gonna save this comment and dig around the points when I get a chance in my backlog of things to dig
Yeah, any nation which practices idolatry, especially to the degree Rome did, is destined for a fall. God did it to Israel multiple times, using pagan nations to overthrow them. What's interesting to me is that God used Babylon as the final straw to enslave Israel. However, God also promised to turn His attention upon Babylon, and recompense it for its own wickedness. Do you know of any links between the Khazars and ancient Babylon?
People keep telling me the Catholic church, who I believe to be Babylon 2.0, "Mystery Babylon", was good at the start (at transition between Pagan Rome and Papal Rome) but then was "infiltrated by Jews" or Khazars or whatever else name. I've got another comment saved on the topic but curious to see if you have found any connections to Babylon. One which stands out to me is the fact that the "Talmud" is properly called "The Babylonian Talmud" and is a collection of things Israel learned, begun practicing, teaching, during their time as captives in ancient Babylon. (not all Israelites adopted these ways, but many did)
Sorry, but based on bible modifications, I've declined to go that direction. I would, if I knew I had all the books, unmodified. Since even my own bloodline history has been shredded, I'm uncomfortable trying to assemble factual information on any of that. My apologies for being unable to help.