There we ho, that's the ""smErter"" part I was talking about....
Confederation of States (1781)
There's absolutely Nothing written anywhere, that shows this as any form of Title at all....
Both the Federation and the Confederation were designed and intended to work for the Union States in international and global venues, as "instruments" or "agents" to conduct business.
No, it is ONLY the Federation that works as an Agent of the states, and that comes from SOURCE, the Catechism of the Unite States Constitution....
The American Confederation created in 1781 was additionally awarded a Constitutional Service Contract in 1787.
So a nonexistent entity was awarded a Service Contract under the Constitution, but nobody has a direct Link that shows the actual Contract???
Most believable dude, Most Believable...
The American Government is still fully functional despite these injuries;
Wrong again, it is still Fully INTACT, but has FOREIGN AGENTS in the seats, and is not functioning how it should, it is being OPERATED by those same Foreign Agents, and they have been using and abusing those powers since Lincoln got into Office, and IF you were correct, we would have 2 Solid Federations working at the same time, which we DO NOT....
I' go on, but I've had enough nonsense from this silly diatribe you've spilt all over this thread....
Let me guess, you got this garbage from Anna Von Schtupen-Reitz, right???
Well, at least you got the Last Paragraph mostly correct, I suppose that's some sort of consolation Prize....
Because I WANT some type of PROOF other than ""werds"" from peeps....
I could be very adamant about the color of the Sky being Green, and might be able to actually fool some of the people, but others are going to call on that BS....
I'm simply asking for Solid Proof....
Two Separate U.S. Constitutions Side by Side, AND now, some Magical Constitutional Contract that YOU claim exists....
SHOW ME THE PICTURES, or give me LINKS directly to these things, otherwise it's ALL Bullshit....
Here is a story from a researcher that may help you understand the constitutions:
When I was about fourteen years-old I noticed that there were two Constitutions in evidence, even though everyone persisted in talking about "the" Constitution as if there was only one.
Those two commonly available Constitutions are:
"The Constitution of the United States of America" and "The Constitution of the United States".
As recently as two years ago, I was able to go down to the local Barnes and Noble, and pick up recent publications of both documents. So, it really shouldn't be any Big News that there are multiple Constitutions.
Then, in my twenties, I heard --- from the local Congressman during a dinner after a Townhall Meeting -- about a Constitution "robed in dust" and laying in full view in one of the rooms at the Capitol Building. This strange artifact was a Constitution, but under a different name: The Constitution for the united States of America.
Like so many other bits and pieces I ran across, I flagged that for further reference, but it wasn't until twenty-five years after that, that Bill Benson's research into the lack of ratification for the Sixteenth Amendment got me motivated to start searching for documents that "should be there" --and aren't.
Thousands of people SAY they have ""SEEN"" the two differently Titled Constitutions, and so far, every time I ask for Proof, absolutely NOBODY, has shown me the Two Differently Titled Constitutions side by side....
Now, Ass-U-me-ing they didn't change the Text or Body of the Document, Which they DID DO via ""Amendments"", then the ONLY thing left is the Specific TITLES....
Of these Two, there are only Two Words that supposedly get flipped around....
TO and FOR....
THAT is the piece of the Puzzle that NOBODY has shown me, and so far, makes me believe that NOBODY actually has proof of....
So it stands as Conjecture, with the Bill of Adjustments, aka The Communist Amendments #11 through 27 exempted....
This mathematical expression is true, it has been proven:
If f(x) is differentiable at x=a then f(x) is continuous at x=a.
Is it my job to convince you of that? Of course not. you need to study math from its foundation thru advance calculus to understand how the theorem is proven.
To understand the validity of my statement that there are actually 3 constitutions you need to study the foundation of American history, not U.S. History.
Plus you will need to over-come the gaslighting, that you have been exposed to, regarding the unincorporated American State Assemblies.
""State Nationals"" is Easily proven to be Directly from L.B. Bork, His Invention, an Directly Stolen from His Book, ""The RED Amendment""....
As for moving your Legal Status from U.S. Citizen over to State Citizen, or State National, or Native of a State, is not really a Complicated Process, but it does directly involve sending letters directly to Specific Government Agencies, and a One Page Letter just doesn't cut it....
Anna Von CuntingRatz stupidly points out that the Dual System of Law existed Long before Christ appeared....
Although this is True, there isn't a Damned thing anyone can DO about that, and IS NOT a point of Law nor Contention....
We are NOT INTERESTED in Pre-American Law History or anything else, ONLY the Law between 1776 and Today, so REMOVE all of the Bullshit she wrote that's applicable to PRE-American History and Law, and what you are left with is ALL of L.B. Borks Writings....
She's a Fucking Intellectual Property Thief and Plagiarist, and deserves the Expulsion and Punishment she will be receiving for her Massive deceptions, and for Mixing things that do not go together....
She even, in a round about way, admits she doesn't understand the 14th Amendment, not that very many do, and it was written in a Special Way to make it Difficult to understand, but I can, and I do....
An she is WRONG that Bork thinks the 14th is the Only Law that is Key to fixing the problems, he says so in his Book, how did she miss that???
I'm not seeing any Differences, neither one has ANY TITLE at all, and in a quick sampling aka Spot Checking, even the words in various places are exactly the same words....
Zero Changes other than the Font used, one being hand Written an the other being Machine Printed....
There we ho, that's the ""smErter"" part I was talking about....
There's absolutely Nothing written anywhere, that shows this as any form of Title at all....
No, it is ONLY the Federation that works as an Agent of the states, and that comes from SOURCE, the Catechism of the Unite States Constitution....
So a nonexistent entity was awarded a Service Contract under the Constitution, but nobody has a direct Link that shows the actual Contract???
Most believable dude, Most Believable...
Wrong again, it is still Fully INTACT, but has FOREIGN AGENTS in the seats, and is not functioning how it should, it is being OPERATED by those same Foreign Agents, and they have been using and abusing those powers since Lincoln got into Office, and IF you were correct, we would have 2 Solid Federations working at the same time, which we DO NOT....
I' go on, but I've had enough nonsense from this silly diatribe you've spilt all over this thread....
Let me guess, you got this garbage from Anna Von Schtupen-Reitz, right???
Well, at least you got the Last Paragraph mostly correct, I suppose that's some sort of consolation Prize....
Why do you spend this amount of time and energy trying not to understand?
Because I WANT some type of PROOF other than ""werds"" from peeps....
I could be very adamant about the color of the Sky being Green, and might be able to actually fool some of the people, but others are going to call on that BS....
I'm simply asking for Solid Proof....
Two Separate U.S. Constitutions Side by Side, AND now, some Magical Constitutional Contract that YOU claim exists....
SHOW ME THE PICTURES, or give me LINKS directly to these things, otherwise it's ALL Bullshit....
Here is a story from a researcher that may help you understand the constitutions:
When I was about fourteen years-old I noticed that there were two Constitutions in evidence, even though everyone persisted in talking about "the" Constitution as if there was only one.
Those two commonly available Constitutions are:
"The Constitution of the United States of America" and "The Constitution of the United States".
As recently as two years ago, I was able to go down to the local Barnes and Noble, and pick up recent publications of both documents. So, it really shouldn't be any Big News that there are multiple Constitutions.
Then, in my twenties, I heard --- from the local Congressman during a dinner after a Townhall Meeting -- about a Constitution "robed in dust" and laying in full view in one of the rooms at the Capitol Building. This strange artifact was a Constitution, but under a different name: The Constitution for the united States of America.
Like so many other bits and pieces I ran across, I flagged that for further reference, but it wasn't until twenty-five years after that, that Bill Benson's research into the lack of ratification for the Sixteenth Amendment got me motivated to start searching for documents that "should be there" --and aren't.
And THAT is exactly the Problem....
Thousands of people SAY they have ""SEEN"" the two differently Titled Constitutions, and so far, every time I ask for Proof, absolutely NOBODY, has shown me the Two Differently Titled Constitutions side by side....
Now, Ass-U-me-ing they didn't change the Text or Body of the Document, Which they DID DO via ""Amendments"", then the ONLY thing left is the Specific TITLES....
Of these Two, there are only Two Words that supposedly get flipped around....
TO and FOR....
THAT is the piece of the Puzzle that NOBODY has shown me, and so far, makes me believe that NOBODY actually has proof of....
So it stands as Conjecture, with the Bill of Adjustments, aka The Communist Amendments #11 through 27 exempted....
This mathematical expression is true, it has been proven:
If f(x) is differentiable at x=a then f(x) is continuous at x=a.
Is it my job to convince you of that? Of course not. you need to study math from its foundation thru advance calculus to understand how the theorem is proven.
To understand the validity of my statement that there are actually 3 constitutions you need to study the foundation of American history, not U.S. History.
Plus you will need to over-come the gaslighting, that you have been exposed to, regarding the unincorporated American State Assemblies.
https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/
""State Nationals"" is Easily proven to be Directly from L.B. Bork, His Invention, an Directly Stolen from His Book, ""The RED Amendment""....
As for moving your Legal Status from U.S. Citizen over to State Citizen, or State National, or Native of a State, is not really a Complicated Process, but it does directly involve sending letters directly to Specific Government Agencies, and a One Page Letter just doesn't cut it....
Anna Von CuntingRatz stupidly points out that the Dual System of Law existed Long before Christ appeared....
Although this is True, there isn't a Damned thing anyone can DO about that, and IS NOT a point of Law nor Contention....
We are NOT INTERESTED in Pre-American Law History or anything else, ONLY the Law between 1776 and Today, so REMOVE all of the Bullshit she wrote that's applicable to PRE-American History and Law, and what you are left with is ALL of L.B. Borks Writings....
She's a Fucking Intellectual Property Thief and Plagiarist, and deserves the Expulsion and Punishment she will be receiving for her Massive deceptions, and for Mixing things that do not go together....
She even, in a round about way, admits she doesn't understand the 14th Amendment, not that very many do, and it was written in a Special Way to make it Difficult to understand, but I can, and I do....
An she is WRONG that Bork thinks the 14th is the Only Law that is Key to fixing the problems, he says so in his Book, how did she miss that???
http://annavonreitz.com/lbbork.pdf
The True State Nationals...
https://statenationals.net/
Here are two JPG files of photocopies of the Original Constitution for the united States of America
http://annavonreitz.com/constitution1.jpg
http://annavonreitz.com/constitution2.jpg
Here are the best scans:
http://annavonreitz.com/1787constitutionpg1.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/1787constitutionpg2.pdf
Here is the PDF file of the text of the actual document transcribed for easier reading.
http://annavonreitz.com/constitutionoriginal.pdf
I'm not seeing any Differences, neither one has ANY TITLE at all, and in a quick sampling aka Spot Checking, even the words in various places are exactly the same words....
Zero Changes other than the Font used, one being hand Written an the other being Machine Printed....