IVERMECTIN Tested against 28 types of Cancer - which cancers were most sensitive to Ivermectin? Which were least sensitive? - The Great Awakening

IVERMECTIN Tested against 28 types of Cancer - which cancers were most sensitive to Ivermectin? Which were least sensitive? (twitter.com) 🧘Mental/Physical Health 🏋🏼‍♂️

posted 93 days ago by brain_dead 93 days ago by brain_dead +291 / -0

98 comments

98 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (98)

sorted by:

▲ 32 ▼

– frank_Dingleberg 32 points 93 days ago +36 / -4

I hear that smoking a nice phatty before bed or popping an ample edible can be an uplifting yet stunning & persuasive way to put those intruder cells in check. It’s all in the cannabinoids, baybee!! 😸

permalink save report block reply

▲ 33 ▼

– ZeroDeltaTango 33 points 93 days ago +33 / -0

US govt has known since 1974 that THC kills cancer cells

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 7 ▼

– Knew2u 7 points 93 days ago +8 / -1

I believe it has health benefits, which is why they've withheld it from us as an "illegal substance" for so many years. Also believe the same of tobacco. Lots of tobacco users in my family and most have lived into their 90s.

Plus, wasn't marijuana/THC confirmed to prevent or fend off glaucoma?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 11 ▼

– queue-anon 11 points 93 days ago +12 / -1

, which is why they've withheld it from us as an "illegal substance" for so many years

It's odd that democrat states are legalizing it if this is true.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– NanoKhuma 3 points 93 days ago +3 / -0

It's really not, they'll just have some Big Tobacco/Big Pharma company poison the shit out of any licensed, "legal" product, to negate any benefit from THC.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q