Devolution and Q seem to line up very well. All it takes to believe in some sort of devolution operation is a lot of reading, because it’s heavily documented.
Q tends to focus on Socratic reasoning and pointing at locations to dig to do the research yourself. The primary value is in helping to discover a lot of the things that have been going on, which are irrelevant to whether Q is “legit” or not. Whether it is tied to ongoing events or not and the “proofs” that it is tied to DJT/military are the primary point of “convincing”, and several of us saw those happening in real time, but aren’t critical to accept to get positives out of it, if that’s what you mean by “follow, but not convinced”.
What seems more important to me, is what we aught to be doing as a result of all this. Being prepared for roadbumps seems like a given, but also a bare minimum. What else should we be doing? What should we know that we don’t?
https://devolution.link
Devolution and Q seem to line up very well. All it takes to believe in some sort of devolution operation is a lot of reading, because it’s heavily documented.
Q tends to focus on Socratic reasoning and pointing at locations to dig to do the research yourself. The primary value is in helping to discover a lot of the things that have been going on, which are irrelevant to whether Q is “legit” or not. Whether it is tied to ongoing events or not and the “proofs” that it is tied to DJT/military are the primary point of “convincing”, and several of us saw those happening in real time, but aren’t critical to accept to get positives out of it, if that’s what you mean by “follow, but not convinced”.
What seems more important to me, is what we aught to be doing as a result of all this. Being prepared for roadbumps seems like a given, but also a bare minimum. What else should we be doing? What should we know that we don’t?