None of it is FUD except for where the price may go being "Uncertain". BTC has deviated from its intended purpose by design by the very people who seek to profit over people today by ancient Babylonian money magic.
Bitcoin was intentionally crippled by or through agencies controlled by the clowns as early as 2014-15 when Gavin Andresen handed the development keys over and Blockstream took over. It's only gotten more blatant and visible as time has gone on.
Blockstream's small-block chain sabotage has turned BTC into a glorified ponzi where you buy and "hodl" until you sell it to a greater fool for fiat.
To get past the 7 tps tx limit Blockstream and Lightning Labs began working on the Lightning Network (L2) in order to offer a distributed channel for smaller transactions that would be classified as daily or payment transactions. The problem is that Lightning breaks down with small-blocks and people are forced into these centrally controlled hubs where payment channels centralize instead of route in a distributed fashion (the Lightning Network Whitepaper even suggests that Lightning should be interfaced with at least a 133mb block L1 chain).
So while it may be of your opinion, your opinion is wrong (cordially).
I appreciate you acknowledging that the tech behind BCH is better (why is that?)
However, I will grant you that BTC could simply win out such as cassettes vs. Betamax (better tech but not as adopted).
Stack BTC sats (I do too) but don't be surprised if the carpet is pulled from under you and the chain simply breaks down due to intentional design choices by the developers.
None of it is FUD except for where the price may go being "Uncertain". BTC has deviated from its intended purpose by design by the very people who seek to profit over people today by ancient Babylonian money magic.
Bitcoin was intentionally crippled by or through agencies controlled by the clowns as early as 2014-15 when Gavin Andresen handed the development keys over and Blockstream took over. It's only gotten more blatant and visible as time has gone on.
Blockstream's small-block chain sabotage has turned BTC into a glorified ponzi where you buy and "hodl" until you sell it to a greater fool for fiat.
To get past the 7 tps tx limit Blockstream and Lightning Labs began working on the Lightning Network (L2) in order to offer a distributed channel for smaller transactions that would be classified as daily or payment transactions. The problem is that Lightning breaks down with small-blocks and people are forced into these centrally controlled hubs where payment channels centralize instead of route in a distributed fashion (the Lightning Network Whitepaper even suggests that Lightning should be interfaced with at least a 133mb block L1 chain).
So while it may be of your opinion, your opinion is wrong (cordially).
I appreciate you acknowledging that the tech behind BCH is better (why is that?)
However, I will grant you that BTC could simply win out such as cassettes vs. Betamax (better tech but not as adopted).
Stack BTC sats (I do too) but don't be surprised if the carpet is pulled from under you and the chain simply breaks down due to intentional design choices by the developers.