Is there a mention of Bydan being “couped” or taken out of office any other way in ANY Q post? I have no clue about finding Q posts but I know A LOT of you very smart people do. Almost every big event that has happened in the last 2+ yrs has a Q post referencing it. Why no Q post for something this historical and illegal ( her getting his money and delegates)?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
Good drop. The obvious supposition was a fast baked bread. It's an archived notable which has led to a whole assortment of branching theory and buns and adnausem anon circular conjecture for years now. All for a reason: answering OPs question if nothing else at all but the intangible string of events that might cascade of even such a question being answered... spoken even.
Very good drop.