Hi Everyone,
I've been posting on here about my quest to remove CA State Senator Scott Wiener from office, void his votes and void his legislation as he has been working unlawfully without an oath: https://greatawakening.win/p/17txobDPOK/update-the-california-state-sena/
I am certain the three clips below will resonate with liberals. They may not change anyone's mind, but they will certainly plant seeds of doubt about the integrity of Scott Wiener and the Democrat party in general. Given how the democrat party is imploding right now, the soil may finally be fertile for these seeds to grow. Please share with your liberal friends.
Clip 1: 90-seconds red pill that Wiener is decriminalizing pedophelia Wiener Gutted SB 1414, the Bill to Make Child Sex Trafficking a Felony
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKuvGbLbsmk
SB1414, the bill to make child sex trafficking a felony, was gutted by the State Senate Public Safety Committee. Wiener sits on that committee. Proof: https://digitaldemocracy.calmatters.org/bills/ca_202320240sb1414 https://sr12.senate.ca.gov/content/sen-groves-measure-make-purchasing-child-sex-felony-passes-senate-floor-critical-amendments https://spsf.senate.ca.gov/members
Clip 2: 4-minutes to cast doubt on Scott Wiener's integrity Why Would Scott Wiener Not to Take An Oath When He Knows Working Without One is a Felony?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omIaL8fahzg
Proof: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2769
Clip 3: 90-seconds red pill that the State Senate thinks laws don't apply to them Scott Wiener's Sacramento Office Denies Illegality of Un-Signed Oath
https://rumble.com/v5crn79-scott-wieners-sacramento-office-denies-illegality-of-signed-oath.html
After I saw the video, I wrote her an email letting her know that she may have committed a felony since Wiener has not publicly produced this oath that she claimed that he allegedly signed: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/letter-to-anna-esparza-re-wiener-oath.pdf
I think almost everyone in every state and the federal government has been working without an oath.
I can only speak to what I have seen in California. At the high levels, a high percentage of government workers don't have oaths. They know the penalties for treason of oath is worse than working without an oath, so the people who know they are committing treason of oath by ordering underlings to do certain things take a calculated risk. Usually low level workers who just follow orders have proper oaths in place. Edit to add: my experience has been that these underlings are used as patsies. For example, a Deputy Chief Counsel at the CA income tax agency wrote me a letter that contained fraud. He made an underling (who had an oath) sign it instead of signing it himself.