The answer is yes. The more liberty there is the more danger there is that people may use that liberty to cause harm. But to make a society as safe as possible requires it to be a police state and therefore the least free. The founders understood this.
I do not know if I agree. The whole spirit behind the revolution was people standing up for their own sovereignty. The citizen militia embodied that spirit.
I've seen advocates for our societies and communities to police and hold themselves accountable. Leaving Organized defense only for international relations (aka military). Currently, around the world, the cabal has worked to corporatize police forces, so that they represent the oligarchies and government corporations, rather than the people.
This needs to change. Making a society as safe as possible requires the people in that society to be of good character, and to stand up to protect and care for each other, as in "I am my brother's keeper". In such a society, crime, violence and such issues would be dealt with very quickly by the community itself. But of course, the underlying premise is men and women of character who take responsibility for their families but also for their community and society.
From an establishment of government perspective is what im talking about. What youre saying is what im saying: in a free society it is up to the people to use their liberty to make things safe not to have safety forced upon them.
The answer is yes. The more liberty there is the more danger there is that people may use that liberty to cause harm. But to make a society as safe as possible requires it to be a police state and therefore the least free. The founders understood this.
I do not know if I agree. The whole spirit behind the revolution was people standing up for their own sovereignty. The citizen militia embodied that spirit.
I've seen advocates for our societies and communities to police and hold themselves accountable. Leaving Organized defense only for international relations (aka military). Currently, around the world, the cabal has worked to corporatize police forces, so that they represent the oligarchies and government corporations, rather than the people.
This needs to change. Making a society as safe as possible requires the people in that society to be of good character, and to stand up to protect and care for each other, as in "I am my brother's keeper". In such a society, crime, violence and such issues would be dealt with very quickly by the community itself. But of course, the underlying premise is men and women of character who take responsibility for their families but also for their community and society.
That's where I think we are headed.
From an establishment of government perspective is what im talking about. What youre saying is what im saying: in a free society it is up to the people to use their liberty to make things safe not to have safety forced upon them.
Yes, exactly. But that's an important distinction.