Sure, the military and the NIH are involved (has been like this for decades), but I don't think it's correct to say the vaccine was "developed by the military and not pharma".
There are multiple leaks of internal Pfizer documents detailing clinical trial procedures, safety verification, production, distribution, and post market surveillance methods which reveals major irregularities and safety risks.
Why would Pfizer create confidential documents incriminating itself, than have those documents be "leaked", if the vaccine was developed and produced by the US military?
That doesn't track.
Sure, the military and the NIH are involved (has been like this for decades), but I don't think it's correct to say the vaccine was "developed by the military and not pharma".
There are multiple leaks of internal Pfizer documents detailing clinical trial procedures, safety verification, production, distribution, and post market surveillance methods which reveals major irregularities and safety risks.
Why would Pfizer create confidential documents incriminating itself, than have those documents be "leaked", if the vaccine was developed and produced by the US military?