That's not exactly what she said. She said that there was definitely more to the story and it should be investigated. Which I agree with. Was it an inside job? Probably/most likely. But until you bring receipts, you are just speculating. I find the lack of interest in finding out what happened to be, well, disturbing.
That's not exactly what she said. She said that there was definitely more to the story and it should be investigated. Which I agree with. Was it an inside job? Probably/most likely. But until you bring receipts, you are just speculating. I find the lack of interest in finding out what happened to be, well, disturbing.
Disagree. Someone in her position needs to be careful what she says.
She basically said "it was an inside job" without saying it;
"Why didn't law enforcement arrest the shooter before the speech? There is definitely more to this story and we need to uncover the truth"
That's about as blatant as you can get for someone in her position.