IMHO, the selection of the most powerful and responsible person (the president) should not be done by the idiots, imbeciles and morons. Think of it as this way. In a company where the staff is hiring people not everyone gets the chance to sit in the interview panel. Because it takes certain ability to conduct interviews, assess people's skills being interviewed and judgemental skills. Just like how every migrant is required to take the citizenship test before getting qualified as a citizen, it might be a good idea for a registered voter to also take a test on the constitutional values, how the Congress works, basic knowledge of the election process, etc before being eligible to vote. A mandatory selection of a reason to choose a particular candidate as well as comments would be required when a voter chooses a candidate. An independent panel can process these selections and decide whether to accept the vote or reject.
Of course such measures can also backfire from the thinking angle of Democrats with brainwashed narrative about Trump (you know the whole "convicted felon", "nazi", "insurrectionist", etc.) and thought of anyone still choosing to vote for Trump being an idiot and not eligible to vote. Perhaps that's the reason for simple "anyone can vote" route that our founding fathers put forth.
so bring back jim crow laws? literacy testing for all? or maybe just have a committee of government or party appointed elites who will determine who shall be able to be president? you know, kind of like it already is...
maybe lets not allow citizens to vote, because they might have their own national interests in mind and not the interests of the rest of the world. perhaps people from around the globe should be able to appoint the president of the united states instead of these stupid americans. these citizens should just shut up, pay their taxes and remain the slaves to the global elite that they are. is that your idea?
yes, it makes me angry that someone that supposedly believes in the Great Awakening starts getting close to these ridiculous ideas. and for the less intelligent that are reading this, no, I am not looking to have these things.
And it makes me angry that someone who supposedly believes in the Great Awakening doesn't even consider the idea of having a bit more scrutiny into who has the right to vote, or at least to re-evaluate how voting works.
Or do you subscribe to the globalist idea that everyone is born equal? if nothing else the last 4 years made it really clear the answer to that, the amount of absolutely retarded people is this world is far above what most of us could even imagine; Do you still trust them to make a critical choice that affects all?
He's saying that maybe not everyone, including citizens (but ONLY citizens) should have the right to vote, and I agree.
Is it an easy thing to implement? absolutely not! what would be the criteria? who gets to decide the ones that match the criteria?
But if we don't start at least considering these things now, things are NEVER going to significantly change..
Here's an idea that I just made up:
Every citizen gets to vote, but the votes do not weight the same
People who have proven themselves to be able administrators, great public servants (real servants not the vermin we have today), community pillars and overall great achievers can apply for a greater vote weight
These petitions get evaluated by a particular group, say like a city council, which will serve for, at the most, 2 election cycles before being rotated entirely (could be elected officials themselves), and individuals cannot serve again in that capacity for at least 10 years after their term ends
The individuals with greater vote weights need to constantly prove themselves ,every say 2 or 3 elections they get re-evaluated, if they are found not to be under the MERIT defined guidelines their vote weight starts going back down.
In my mind something like this could work, and there's no excuse, everyone (citizens) gets a vote, but you want your vote to count more? then it's up to you.
But something MUST be done... we cannot be held hostage by the retards.
gee, I wonder where the term "all men are created equal" comes from. seems to me what you are suggesting is more a marxist or fascist form of government. once the wrong people have more weight in their vote, then we have a similar situation to what we have today. what would be the next step? eliminate the stupid? who is to judge who is stupid and who is not? disagree completely with you mindset on this issue.
Big difference, I'll leave it to you to figure it out.
And again, something must be done, and it's not easy, if the higher weight is based on merit it'd absolutely NOT be a similar situation that we have today
Specially considering what we have today is pretty much selection, not election.
IMHO, the selection of the most powerful and responsible person (the president) should not be done by the idiots, imbeciles and morons. Think of it as this way. In a company where the staff is hiring people not everyone gets the chance to sit in the interview panel. Because it takes certain ability to conduct interviews, assess people's skills being interviewed and judgemental skills. Just like how every migrant is required to take the citizenship test before getting qualified as a citizen, it might be a good idea for a registered voter to also take a test on the constitutional values, how the Congress works, basic knowledge of the election process, etc before being eligible to vote. A mandatory selection of a reason to choose a particular candidate as well as comments would be required when a voter chooses a candidate. An independent panel can process these selections and decide whether to accept the vote or reject.
Of course such measures can also backfire from the thinking angle of Democrats with brainwashed narrative about Trump (you know the whole "convicted felon", "nazi", "insurrectionist", etc.) and thought of anyone still choosing to vote for Trump being an idiot and not eligible to vote. Perhaps that's the reason for simple "anyone can vote" route that our founding fathers put forth.
so bring back jim crow laws? literacy testing for all? or maybe just have a committee of government or party appointed elites who will determine who shall be able to be president? you know, kind of like it already is...
maybe lets not allow citizens to vote, because they might have their own national interests in mind and not the interests of the rest of the world. perhaps people from around the globe should be able to appoint the president of the united states instead of these stupid americans. these citizens should just shut up, pay their taxes and remain the slaves to the global elite that they are. is that your idea?
yes, it makes me angry that someone that supposedly believes in the Great Awakening starts getting close to these ridiculous ideas. and for the less intelligent that are reading this, no, I am not looking to have these things.
And it makes me angry that someone who supposedly believes in the Great Awakening doesn't even consider the idea of having a bit more scrutiny into who has the right to vote, or at least to re-evaluate how voting works.
Or do you subscribe to the globalist idea that everyone is born equal? if nothing else the last 4 years made it really clear the answer to that, the amount of absolutely retarded people is this world is far above what most of us could even imagine; Do you still trust them to make a critical choice that affects all?
He's saying that maybe not everyone, including citizens (but ONLY citizens) should have the right to vote, and I agree.
Is it an easy thing to implement? absolutely not! what would be the criteria? who gets to decide the ones that match the criteria?
But if we don't start at least considering these things now, things are NEVER going to significantly change..
Here's an idea that I just made up:
In my mind something like this could work, and there's no excuse, everyone (citizens) gets a vote, but you want your vote to count more? then it's up to you.
But something MUST be done... we cannot be held hostage by the retards.
gee, I wonder where the term "all men are created equal" comes from. seems to me what you are suggesting is more a marxist or fascist form of government. once the wrong people have more weight in their vote, then we have a similar situation to what we have today. what would be the next step? eliminate the stupid? who is to judge who is stupid and who is not? disagree completely with you mindset on this issue.
Created equal, not born equal
Big difference, I'll leave it to you to figure it out.
And again, something must be done, and it's not easy, if the higher weight is based on merit it'd absolutely NOT be a similar situation that we have today
Specially considering what we have today is pretty much selection, not election.