And it makes me angry that someone who supposedly believes in the Great Awakening doesn't even consider the idea of having a bit more scrutiny into who has the right to vote, or at least to re-evaluate how voting works.
Or do you subscribe to the globalist idea that everyone is born equal? if nothing else the last 4 years made it really clear the answer to that, the amount of absolutely retarded people is this world is far above what most of us could even imagine; Do you still trust them to make a critical choice that affects all?
He's saying that maybe not everyone, including citizens (but ONLY citizens) should have the right to vote, and I agree.
Is it an easy thing to implement? absolutely not! what would be the criteria? who gets to decide the ones that match the criteria?
But if we don't start at least considering these things now, things are NEVER going to significantly change..
Here's an idea that I just made up:
Every citizen gets to vote, but the votes do not weight the same
People who have proven themselves to be able administrators, great public servants (real servants not the vermin we have today), community pillars and overall great achievers can apply for a greater vote weight
These petitions get evaluated by a particular group, say like a city council, which will serve for, at the most, 2 election cycles before being rotated entirely (could be elected officials themselves), and individuals cannot serve again in that capacity for at least 10 years after their term ends
The individuals with greater vote weights need to constantly prove themselves ,every say 2 or 3 elections they get re-evaluated, if they are found not to be under the MERIT defined guidelines their vote weight starts going back down.
In my mind something like this could work, and there's no excuse, everyone (citizens) gets a vote, but you want your vote to count more? then it's up to you.
But something MUST be done... we cannot be held hostage by the retards.
gee, I wonder where the term "all men are created equal" comes from. seems to me what you are suggesting is more a marxist or fascist form of government. once the wrong people have more weight in their vote, then we have a similar situation to what we have today. what would be the next step? eliminate the stupid? who is to judge who is stupid and who is not? disagree completely with you mindset on this issue.
Big difference, I'll leave it to you to figure it out.
And again, something must be done, and it's not easy, if the higher weight is based on merit it'd absolutely NOT be a similar situation that we have today
Specially considering what we have today is pretty much selection, not election.
Their = Possessive for they, what you're looking for is "THERE"
With that out of the way, no, I'm not
And I'm having difficulty seeing how establishing a weighted voting system based on merit, in which anyone, From a big company CEO down to local mom & pop grocery store owners or any equivalent entrepreneurial efforts could apply, would equate to establishing Aristocracy.
If anything that kind of thing would only motivate individuals who are pretty capable, but just a bit lazy, to make more of an effort, and contribute more.
You're deeply in the 8 or 80 mindset, either is every retarded welfare user can vote or ARISTOCRACY!!!!!!111!!one
No, there's plenty of room in-between to find a way to make it right, we are not born equal, period, differences in intellect and overall capacity are absurd.
If you had a business would you pick any idiot from the streets to run it or make a very careful selection to decide who would be the best? so why being able to help decide the fate of a nation be any different?
Who said all men are created equal? (I know, it's in the Declaration) but where else did you get that idea? I believe God loves us all and wants each one of us to seek Him and have the opportunity to have a relationship with Him, but clearly, we are not equal. I am not equal to LeBron or MJ when it comes to basketball. I'm not equal to Trump when it comes to business acumen. Etc. etc.
I have also concluded that we SHOULD have some sort of system in place for voters so that those who are a drain on society don't keep voting for their own self interests. When there are people who are 4th generation welfare recipients and only know that lifestyle, when there are 21 year olds who haven't even worked or paid into the system but are working very hard to get on SS disability, when there are disability frauds who can easily work but instead bilk the system and don't contribute one iota to the well being of society, why should they - and illegals - have the opportunity to determine the outcome of a presidential election? And what about all the uninformed? Those, who, by choice, know nothing. (I say by choice because this is the internet age and knowledge is at their fingertips.) For instance, those who still believe the 'very fine people,' lie, or that T is racist, or Biden did great things or that we are a 'democracy' or have never even heard of the Constitution, let alone know what it is. No. I no longer believe everyone should have the right to make those important decisions.
And it makes me angry that someone who supposedly believes in the Great Awakening doesn't even consider the idea of having a bit more scrutiny into who has the right to vote, or at least to re-evaluate how voting works.
Or do you subscribe to the globalist idea that everyone is born equal? if nothing else the last 4 years made it really clear the answer to that, the amount of absolutely retarded people is this world is far above what most of us could even imagine; Do you still trust them to make a critical choice that affects all?
He's saying that maybe not everyone, including citizens (but ONLY citizens) should have the right to vote, and I agree.
Is it an easy thing to implement? absolutely not! what would be the criteria? who gets to decide the ones that match the criteria?
But if we don't start at least considering these things now, things are NEVER going to significantly change..
Here's an idea that I just made up:
In my mind something like this could work, and there's no excuse, everyone (citizens) gets a vote, but you want your vote to count more? then it's up to you.
But something MUST be done... we cannot be held hostage by the retards.
gee, I wonder where the term "all men are created equal" comes from. seems to me what you are suggesting is more a marxist or fascist form of government. once the wrong people have more weight in their vote, then we have a similar situation to what we have today. what would be the next step? eliminate the stupid? who is to judge who is stupid and who is not? disagree completely with you mindset on this issue.
Created equal, not born equal
Big difference, I'll leave it to you to figure it out.
And again, something must be done, and it's not easy, if the higher weight is based on merit it'd absolutely NOT be a similar situation that we have today
Specially considering what we have today is pretty much selection, not election.
HELP ME OUT HERE, ARE YOU SAYING THAT THEIR SHOULD BE AN ARISTOCRACY?
Their = Possessive for they, what you're looking for is "THERE"
With that out of the way, no, I'm not
And I'm having difficulty seeing how establishing a weighted voting system based on merit, in which anyone, From a big company CEO down to local mom & pop grocery store owners or any equivalent entrepreneurial efforts could apply, would equate to establishing Aristocracy.
If anything that kind of thing would only motivate individuals who are pretty capable, but just a bit lazy, to make more of an effort, and contribute more.
You're deeply in the 8 or 80 mindset, either is every retarded welfare user can vote or ARISTOCRACY!!!!!!111!!one
No, there's plenty of room in-between to find a way to make it right, we are not born equal, period, differences in intellect and overall capacity are absurd.
If you had a business would you pick any idiot from the streets to run it or make a very careful selection to decide who would be the best? so why being able to help decide the fate of a nation be any different?
Who said all men are created equal? (I know, it's in the Declaration) but where else did you get that idea? I believe God loves us all and wants each one of us to seek Him and have the opportunity to have a relationship with Him, but clearly, we are not equal. I am not equal to LeBron or MJ when it comes to basketball. I'm not equal to Trump when it comes to business acumen. Etc. etc.
I have also concluded that we SHOULD have some sort of system in place for voters so that those who are a drain on society don't keep voting for their own self interests. When there are people who are 4th generation welfare recipients and only know that lifestyle, when there are 21 year olds who haven't even worked or paid into the system but are working very hard to get on SS disability, when there are disability frauds who can easily work but instead bilk the system and don't contribute one iota to the well being of society, why should they - and illegals - have the opportunity to determine the outcome of a presidential election? And what about all the uninformed? Those, who, by choice, know nothing. (I say by choice because this is the internet age and knowledge is at their fingertips.) For instance, those who still believe the 'very fine people,' lie, or that T is racist, or Biden did great things or that we are a 'democracy' or have never even heard of the Constitution, let alone know what it is. No. I no longer believe everyone should have the right to make those important decisions.