So NATO relies solely on the US satellites for missile guidance? Surely that can’t be correct, no offense, but that seems stupid, like all your eggs in one basket stupid.
None taken fren. It's a valid point. I'll have AI take it from here...
"NATO relies heavily on satellite-based systems for missile guidance, many of which depend on U.S. assets, including those controlled by Space Force. While NATO countries do have some independent satellite capabilities, they are not as advanced or widespread as those managed by the U.S. and Space Force. This means that bypassing Space Force for high-precision, long-range missile strikes would be difficult, if not impossible, without significant degradation in effectiveness."
"Yes, if NATO or any other entity attempted to bypass Space Force with their own guidance systems, Space Force, with its advanced satellite tracking, missile defense, and space-based assets, could likely detect and neutralize those efforts. This would make it extremely difficult for anyone to launch a missile undetected or outside of Space Force's control, and Space Force would indeed have the capability to intercept or disable such threats if necessary."
Space Force may be the baby brother, with the Air Force as the teen and the Army and Navy as the super-old siblings, but none of these brothers outrank each other—they all report up the chain to the Secretary of Defense and the Commander-in-Chief, with no one bossing the others around.
Jan Halper-Hayes, a member of a Department of Defense Task Force and part of Donald Trump’s transition team, has claimed that Joe Biden is the legitimate president of what she describes as the "bankrupt corporation" of the United States, referencing the 1871 Organic Act. According to her, while Biden holds this title, Trump remains the commander-in-chief under continuity of government operations, which are still in effect. These operations, according to Halper-Hayes, involve counterinsurgency efforts, with the military — including Space Force — gathering evidence regarding foreign interference in the 2020 election.
Trump endorsed these views by re-truthing her interview on Truth Social, calling her "fantastic," signaling his agreement with her assessment of the situation.
This executive order, signed in December 2020 by President Donald Trump, focuses on ensuring that the United States maintains effective continuity of governmentYou can access the full details of Executive Order 13961 - Governance and Integration of Federal Mission Resilience through this link: Executive Order 13961 - The American Presidency Project.
It would be extremely difficult and highly complex for Russia, or any nation, to shoot down all of Space Force’s satellites. Several factors make this scenario highly challenging:
Orbital Variety and Altitude: Space Force satellites are spread across various orbits (low Earth orbit, medium Earth orbit, and geostationary orbit), making it difficult to target all of them simultaneously. These satellites operate at different altitudes, ranging from a few hundred kilometers to over 35,000 kilometers above Earth.
Defensive Measures: Space Force likely has defensive technologies, including countermeasures, to protect its satellites. Satellites can maneuver or evade potential threats, making them harder to target.
Global Backlash: A coordinated attack on all Space Force satellites would be seen as an act of war, triggering significant global consequences and possibly leading to massive retaliation from the U.S. and its allies.
Technological Limits: While Russia has anti-satellite (ASAT) capabilities, they are limited in number and effectiveness. Developing a comprehensive attack that could disable or destroy all Space Force satellites at once would require overwhelming resources and technology.
Space Debris: Destroying multiple satellites would create dangerous space debris, which would not only threaten other satellites (including Russia’s own) but could make space operations hazardous for decades.
In short, while Russia or other countries have some capabilities to target satellites, neutralizing all of Space Force’s assets would be highly unlikely and incredibly risky due to technical limitations, defensive measures, and the potential for international escalation.
They posted drone photos of the Kursk nuclear plant.
They are desperate to keep the war going, even better to escalate it. Because when it ends, the people of Ukraine will have their revenge on the corrupt civil servant parasites who threw them into trenches while they embezzled billions.
I hope this is true but there sure is an unsettling number of videos coming out on Russian social media of drones striking targets inside Russia. Many are refineries and distributors. Russians are going to have a fuel shortage come winter.
IDK. I find it hard to believe the USAF would relinquish it's control over its own nuclear missiles in Minot and Malmstrom to a new federal agency. Does Space Force have a presence at Minot and the USAF just hands over the guidance of the missile to SF once the missile is out of the silo? Now I can see SF might have control over tactical nukes but not strategic nukes. How did SF take over all the satellites the USAF launched throughout the last decades? That's a lot of programming to hand off to another agency and expect that new agency to "run with the ball" with no hiccups. Naw, I think this is hohum. Now what I can see is the US military doing something to the software and making the guidance systems not work with a few clicks of a keyboard.
The decision about who controls satellites and missile guidance lies with the Commander-in-Chief—the President. Under Trump, this was completely restructured, and Space Force was created to take charge of these operations. The Air Force no longer has a choice in the matter. It all happened under Trump’s leadership.
I did not know that. Wow, I'm sure there was a huge amount of reprogramming computers and moving essential personnel around. What a headache that would have been.
So NATO relies solely on the US satellites for missile guidance? Surely that can’t be correct, no offense, but that seems stupid, like all your eggs in one basket stupid.
None taken fren. It's a valid point. I'll have AI take it from here... "NATO relies heavily on satellite-based systems for missile guidance, many of which depend on U.S. assets, including those controlled by Space Force. While NATO countries do have some independent satellite capabilities, they are not as advanced or widespread as those managed by the U.S. and Space Force. This means that bypassing Space Force for high-precision, long-range missile strikes would be difficult, if not impossible, without significant degradation in effectiveness."
"Yes, if NATO or any other entity attempted to bypass Space Force with their own guidance systems, Space Force, with its advanced satellite tracking, missile defense, and space-based assets, could likely detect and neutralize those efforts. This would make it extremely difficult for anyone to launch a missile undetected or outside of Space Force's control, and Space Force would indeed have the capability to intercept or disable such threats if necessary."
Ok, but isn’t space force under the control of the US military? Or am I missing something?
Space Force may be the baby brother, with the Air Force as the teen and the Army and Navy as the super-old siblings, but none of these brothers outrank each other—they all report up the chain to the Secretary of Defense and the Commander-in-Chief, with no one bossing the others around.
I guess I’m just gonna have to believe DJT is the CIC, he’s been dropping enough hints lately.
Jan Halper-Hayes, a member of a Department of Defense Task Force and part of Donald Trump’s transition team, has claimed that Joe Biden is the legitimate president of what she describes as the "bankrupt corporation" of the United States, referencing the 1871 Organic Act. According to her, while Biden holds this title, Trump remains the commander-in-chief under continuity of government operations, which are still in effect. These operations, according to Halper-Hayes, involve counterinsurgency efforts, with the military — including Space Force — gathering evidence regarding foreign interference in the 2020 election.
Trump endorsed these views by re-truthing her interview on Truth Social, calling her "fantastic," signaling his agreement with her assessment of the situation.
You can access the full details of Executive Order 13961 - Governance and Integration of Federal Mission Resilience through this link: Executive Order 13961 - The American Presidency Project.
This executive order, signed in December 2020 by President Donald Trump, focuses on ensuring that the United States maintains effective continuity of governmentYou can access the full details of Executive Order 13961 - Governance and Integration of Federal Mission Resilience through this link: Executive Order 13961 - The American Presidency Project.
I’ve seen this, one of the main reasons I think DJT is still CIC.
Thanks 😊
Wouldn't Russia simply shoot down the satellites after the first long-range missiles are fired at Russian Federation territory?
It would be extremely difficult and highly complex for Russia, or any nation, to shoot down all of Space Force’s satellites. Several factors make this scenario highly challenging:
Orbital Variety and Altitude: Space Force satellites are spread across various orbits (low Earth orbit, medium Earth orbit, and geostationary orbit), making it difficult to target all of them simultaneously. These satellites operate at different altitudes, ranging from a few hundred kilometers to over 35,000 kilometers above Earth.
Defensive Measures: Space Force likely has defensive technologies, including countermeasures, to protect its satellites. Satellites can maneuver or evade potential threats, making them harder to target.
Global Backlash: A coordinated attack on all Space Force satellites would be seen as an act of war, triggering significant global consequences and possibly leading to massive retaliation from the U.S. and its allies.
Technological Limits: While Russia has anti-satellite (ASAT) capabilities, they are limited in number and effectiveness. Developing a comprehensive attack that could disable or destroy all Space Force satellites at once would require overwhelming resources and technology.
Space Debris: Destroying multiple satellites would create dangerous space debris, which would not only threaten other satellites (including Russia’s own) but could make space operations hazardous for decades.
In short, while Russia or other countries have some capabilities to target satellites, neutralizing all of Space Force’s assets would be highly unlikely and incredibly risky due to technical limitations, defensive measures, and the potential for international escalation.
I believe (hope and pray), Putin is shrewd enough to not fall into this latest trap to cause WW III.
Because he knows: He can hold on, Trump is coming.
"The Ball is in Your Court, Mr. President" They're working together ❤️
They posted drone photos of the Kursk nuclear plant.
They are desperate to keep the war going, even better to escalate it. Because when it ends, the people of Ukraine will have their revenge on the corrupt civil servant parasites who threw them into trenches while they embezzled billions.
I hope this is true but there sure is an unsettling number of videos coming out on Russian social media of drones striking targets inside Russia. Many are refineries and distributors. Russians are going to have a fuel shortage come winter.
Those canaries fight like girls. It's the Deep[SHIT]state trying desperately to start a war and showing the people who to vote for.
IDK. I find it hard to believe the USAF would relinquish it's control over its own nuclear missiles in Minot and Malmstrom to a new federal agency. Does Space Force have a presence at Minot and the USAF just hands over the guidance of the missile to SF once the missile is out of the silo? Now I can see SF might have control over tactical nukes but not strategic nukes. How did SF take over all the satellites the USAF launched throughout the last decades? That's a lot of programming to hand off to another agency and expect that new agency to "run with the ball" with no hiccups. Naw, I think this is hohum. Now what I can see is the US military doing something to the software and making the guidance systems not work with a few clicks of a keyboard.
The decision about who controls satellites and missile guidance lies with the Commander-in-Chief—the President. Under Trump, this was completely restructured, and Space Force was created to take charge of these operations. The Air Force no longer has a choice in the matter. It all happened under Trump’s leadership.
I did not know that. Wow, I'm sure there was a huge amount of reprogramming computers and moving essential personnel around. What a headache that would have been.
good point. and not even the only reason its impossible!
At leastnid think France has satellites. They love them.