Ghislaine Maxwell's sex trafficking conviction is upheld.
(www.reuters.com)
Comments (8)
sorted by:
So who exactly were her clients again? (sarcasm)
How does one get convicted trafficking children to nobody? And to think an appeals court upheld that....
guess she should have given up all the clients when she had the chance....rot in HELL beotch
Gizzy, make a deal and spill ALL - I'd rather see the men who participated held accountable. (she's toast anyway)
She doesn't have to. "We have it all."
I hope so !
This is the reason she hasn't named names. There's no incentive.
I'm going to hazard a guess that anyone she names is going to be rich and powerful and wouldn't hesitate to hurt her or anyone she cares about if she does name them.
So why would she name them if she didn't benefit from it, and she or someone she cares about might be harmed if she does?
enjoy your new home...........