It's been well documented that Hezbollah is a militant organization with ties to terrorism. Of course I do not support the innocents that were harmed. That is tragic but often a consequence of unconventional warfare in which both sides engage.
I fully support our Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, ideologically and in actual practice.
So you are well aware that if you exercise your 2nd amendment rights together with likeminded people against an enemy who has the favor of someone in the media, you'll be branded a militant organization, yes? And very likely domestic terrorists? If someone responds to your group's defense efforts by interdicting products you purchase to cause them to explode parts of your body off, forcing your "early retirement" from "terrorism", should society consider that a "win win"? A tragic consequence of unconventional warfare in which both sides engage?
It's been well documented that Hezbollah is a militant organization with ties to terrorism. Of course I do not support the innocents that were harmed. That is tragic but often a consequence of unconventional warfare in which both sides engage.
I fully support our Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, ideologically and in actual practice.
So you are well aware that if you exercise your 2nd amendment rights together with likeminded people against an enemy who has the favor of someone in the media, you'll be branded a militant organization, yes? And very likely domestic terrorists? If someone responds to your group's defense efforts by interdicting products you purchase to cause them to explode parts of your body off, forcing your "early retirement" from "terrorism", should society consider that a "win win"? A tragic consequence of unconventional warfare in which both sides engage?