This is very interesting, considering the apparent role of DOD in actually developing the jabs. It seems counterintuitive for DOD to conclude from actual testing that the best treatment for coronavirus is IVM/HCQ, then 15 years later to suddenly decide "No, let's try something completely unproven instead".
Remember-- big pharma wanted to keep a lid on what was in the jabs. What if DOD tasked Pfizer, etc. to produce vaccines (using their recipe) that were safe and effective, but the DS decided to use all of its power to convince people that the jabs were deadly, people were dying on TV, etc.?
This theory relies heavily on a consensus-based reality.
This is very interesting, considering the apparent role of DOD in actually developing the jabs. It seems counterintuitive for DOD to conclude from actual testing that the best treatment for coronavirus is IVM/HCQ, then 15 years later to suddenly decide "No, let's try something completely unproven instead".
Remember-- big pharma wanted to keep a lid on what was in the jabs. What if DOD tasked Pfizer, etc. to produce vaccines (using their recipe) that were safe and effective, but the DS decided to use all of its power to convince people that the jabs were deadly, people were dying on TV, etc.?
This theory relies heavily on a consensus-based reality.