That would be an (edit: white) pawn moving down the g file towards the (edit: black) pieces and I have no idea why someone would say that is “nearly always fatal.”
Edit: my bad, sick and tired as I wrote that^. Chessfag here not sure why g5 to g6 would be characterized as “nearly always fatal.” The chess generalizations are getting annoying to me
Same. I just racked my brain trying to make sense of g5-g6. I can't figure it no matter what stage of the game. Q at g6 with B at b5 is common if playing an unskilled player but this Rambo dude makes no sense here. He often doesn't anyway kek
That would be an (edit: white) pawn moving down the g file towards the (edit: black) pieces and I have no idea why someone would say that is “nearly always fatal.”
Edit: my bad, sick and tired as I wrote that^. Chessfag here not sure why g5 to g6 would be characterized as “nearly always fatal.” The chess generalizations are getting annoying to me
I just googled that and this came up https://g6.ed.gov/
A new manner of writing for grants! Sick and tired of sick and tired!
Im a beginner but i think inter dimensionally and, it is possible that 7 hides 5 and 5 can hide in 6 but not entirely vice versa.
Same. I just racked my brain trying to make sense of g5-g6. I can't figure it no matter what stage of the game. Q at g6 with B at b5 is common if playing an unskilled player but this Rambo dude makes no sense here. He often doesn't anyway kek