No, the audit of hand counts was of the receipts printed out by the machines. Any other audit, of actual ballots, always produced ridiculous signatures, duplicates, etc. They manipulated the initial 'audit' to force a recounting of exactly the corrupted output and nothing else.
No, the audit of hand counts was of the receipts printed out by the machines. Any other audit, of actual ballots, always produced ridiculous signatures, duplicates, etc. They manipulated the initial 'audit' to force a recounting of exactly the corrupted output and nothing else.