The following post is outrageous, unbelievable, and absolutely true. Plenty of sauce links at the bottom.
For context:
The key point in this post, and what all the sauce links are there to prove, is that THE WHITE SPECKLING on the video is an artifact of ionizing radiation hitting the camera sensor. (See Sauce link to understand)
These pixelations are telltale sign of a nuclear explosion. (See Sauce link to understand)
The following is a short clip of more than one NUCLEAR bunker buster bombs exploding in Yemen in 2015. (estimated distance - 6 miles)
https://youtu.be/TueGsI2GXbw?si=xGoMv0WG1t0vaKGr
NOTE: Starting @ 1:10 in the clip the WHITE SPECKLES appearing IN FRONT OF the close-by 'vertical pipe' looking things at the bottom center of the screen... This is ionizing radiation (likely neutrons) overloading the digital camera sensor. NOT speckles/Sparks 6 miles away at the explosion itself.
(watch 1st 25 seconds of the YT Sauce link to understand)
View and highest quality available.
YES These are nukes.
NO the MSM would not have told you.
The camera speckles do not lie.
(watch first 25 seconds of sauce link below or you will NOT understand)
The reason it is important for Anons to know HOW TO IDENTIFY video of NUKES vs NON-Nukes going forward is that I believe as things escalate in Ukraine and in the Middle East, these weapons will once again be showing themselves. Anons need to be able to identify the use of nuclear weapons in real time as the videos are posted on social media. Now you guys know how to tell the difference and separate bullshit from Truth.
Example of a huge, non-nuclear explosion in Lebanon:
https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1837544227443503304
SAUCE: DO NOT SKIP or you will NOT understand. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Controlled laboratory demonstration of the WHITE SPECKLE effect of ionizing radiation on a cell phone video:
https://youtu.be/MsG6JsMAJ_Q?si=T593AN8_R1etKC55
⬆️⬆️⬆️
DID YOU Watch just 25 seconds of the above sauce?
If not then you Will. Not. Understand.
Over 25 comments so far and only ONE additional view on the above clip that proves the entire OP.
There is even an app that uses only the phone camera. In researching this, several websites claim to 'debunk' the idea that ionizing radiation shows up on a video taken with a digital camera.
"RADIATION produces SPOTS IN THE IMAGE that are caused by high energy particles hitting the CMOS-sensor. When the ray is absorbed by the electrons in the censor, they get exited and soon release their excess energy as a flash of light."
Source: https://www.nerdaxic.com/2014/09/01/how-ionizing-radiation-affects-cmos-sensor/
Neutron Bombs leave almost NO residual radiation.
"Since the neutron bomb produced LITTLE OF NO radioactive fallout or residual radiation, the target area could be reoccupied within a matter of hours."
A good read on "clean" nuclear bombs:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_T._Cohen
For the shills and doubters:
Because many of my friends (and maybe some sleeper-shills) on here will automatically doubt my above assertion that nukes indeed have been used right in front of our faces previously, for deeply intellectual reasons such as "but that can't be true because we would definitely know about it," regardless of the extensive sauce, I have prepared a parallel post as some food for thought:
If I were a SHILL...
https://greatawakening.win/p/19957ciQap/
WWG1WGA!
Not a shill but curious... Why are the electronics working to record this? Doesnt the electronic pulse knock out electronic devices, even outside of the blast radius?
According to Grok . . .
No, not all nuclear weapons cause Electromagnetic Pulses (EMPs) that knock out electronics to the same extent or at all. Here's a breakdown of how EMPs relate to nuclear detonations:
High-Altitude Nuclear Detonations: When a nuclear weapon is detonated at very high altitudes (typically above 30 kilometers), it can generate a significant EMP. This is because at high altitudes, the gamma rays from the explosion interact with the Earth's atmosphere over a large area, creating a strong electromagnetic pulse. This type of EMP can affect electronics over a vast geographic area, potentially thousands of kilometers from the detonation point.
Surface or Low-Altitude Detonations: When nuclear weapons are detonated at or near ground level, the EMP effect is generally much less widespread because the energy is absorbed by the surrounding medium (air, earth, water). While there is still an EMP, its range and intensity are significantly reduced compared to high-altitude bursts.
Design of the Weapon: The design of the nuclear weapon itself can influence the EMP. Some nuclear devices might be specifically designed to maximize the EMP effect, while others might prioritize blast or thermal effects.
Environmental Conditions: The EMP's impact can also be influenced by local environmental factors, including geomagnetic conditions and the presence of conductive materials or structures.
Shielding: The susceptibility of electronics to EMPs varies greatly. Modern military equipment, for instance, might be hardened against EMPs, while civilian electronics without such protection could be more vulnerable.
While all nuclear detonations produce some level of EMP, the significant, widespread disruption to electronics is more associated with high-altitude bursts. Ground-level or tactical nuclear weapons might still produce an EMP, but it would typically be of lesser range and impact unless specifically designed otherwise.
Excellent question u/PlayingGoFish
The reason is because in order to create a disruptive-to-electronics EMP, the electronics must be 'relatively' between the blast and the Earth.
That is why a single nuke detonated HIGH (several to dozens of miles) above the United States could black out a large portion of the continent.
John, thanks again for devoting hours to this presentation. Much kudos!
What's a reasonable response to this observation by multiple anons:
Thanks for posing the question so diplomatically u/ZeroDeltaTango. +1
I would say that I am not a nuclear engineer and they should dig further on the topic.
It would also be a good idea to ask how come this is not a common occurrence with countless other videos of large explosions taken with digital cameras? These rapid blinking specs that do not physically move on the frame.
The effect is much clearer if watched in HD.
The good news is that this post has already served its purpose because now enough people know to be suspicious of speckling like that.
The big boom in Lebanon… People are gonna want to know how to separate fact from fiction, nuke from non-nuke. Now even the ones that disagreed will notice.
It seems like you sort of agree it's odd that speckles be localized around the blast area rather than spread across the entire screen
Wonder what causes that
TYVM
Emp is primarily a by product of an air burst. I think this was sub terrestrial.