The following post is outrageous, unbelievable, and absolutely true. Plenty of sauce links at the bottom.
For context:
The key point in this post, and what all the sauce links are there to prove, is that THE WHITE SPECKLING on the video is an artifact of ionizing radiation hitting the camera sensor. (See Sauce link to understand)
These pixelations are telltale sign of a nuclear explosion. (See Sauce link to understand)
The following is a short clip of more than one NUCLEAR bunker buster bombs exploding in Yemen in 2015. (estimated distance - 6 miles)
https://youtu.be/TueGsI2GXbw?si=xGoMv0WG1t0vaKGr
NOTE: Starting @ 1:10 in the clip the WHITE SPECKLES appearing IN FRONT OF the close-by 'vertical pipe' looking things at the bottom center of the screen... This is ionizing radiation (likely neutrons) overloading the digital camera sensor. NOT speckles/Sparks 6 miles away at the explosion itself.
(watch 1st 25 seconds of the YT Sauce link to understand)
View and highest quality available.
YES These are nukes.
NO the MSM would not have told you.
The camera speckles do not lie.
(watch first 25 seconds of sauce link below or you will NOT understand)
The reason it is important for Anons to know HOW TO IDENTIFY video of NUKES vs NON-Nukes going forward is that I believe as things escalate in Ukraine and in the Middle East, these weapons will once again be showing themselves. Anons need to be able to identify the use of nuclear weapons in real time as the videos are posted on social media. Now you guys know how to tell the difference and separate bullshit from Truth.
Example of a huge, non-nuclear explosion in Lebanon:
https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1837544227443503304
SAUCE: DO NOT SKIP or you will NOT understand. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Controlled laboratory demonstration of the WHITE SPECKLE effect of ionizing radiation on a cell phone video:
https://youtu.be/MsG6JsMAJ_Q?si=T593AN8_R1etKC55
⬆️⬆️⬆️
DID YOU Watch just 25 seconds of the above sauce?
If not then you Will. Not. Understand.
Over 25 comments so far and only ONE additional view on the above clip that proves the entire OP.
There is even an app that uses only the phone camera. In researching this, several websites claim to 'debunk' the idea that ionizing radiation shows up on a video taken with a digital camera.
"RADIATION produces SPOTS IN THE IMAGE that are caused by high energy particles hitting the CMOS-sensor. When the ray is absorbed by the electrons in the censor, they get exited and soon release their excess energy as a flash of light."
Source: https://www.nerdaxic.com/2014/09/01/how-ionizing-radiation-affects-cmos-sensor/
Neutron Bombs leave almost NO residual radiation.
"Since the neutron bomb produced LITTLE OF NO radioactive fallout or residual radiation, the target area could be reoccupied within a matter of hours."
A good read on "clean" nuclear bombs:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_T._Cohen
For the shills and doubters:
Because many of my friends (and maybe some sleeper-shills) on here will automatically doubt my above assertion that nukes indeed have been used right in front of our faces previously, for deeply intellectual reasons such as "but that can't be true because we would definitely know about it," regardless of the extensive sauce, I have prepared a parallel post as some food for thought:
If I were a SHILL...
https://greatawakening.win/p/19957ciQap/
WWG1WGA!
This is complete nonsense. Those were exclusively chemical explosions originating at ground level. (Nuclear weapons are detonated at an optimum altitude.) No nuclear flash. No nuclear fireball. No blast wave. Impressive mushroom clouds are an old story for chemical explosions; watch the tail end of Walt Disney's "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" (1954) for the special effects explosion of Nemo's island, Vulcania. The "speckles" are not ionizing radiation effects (and neutrons are not ionizing radiation). You see the same thing in impressive fireworks: little incendiary components of the explosion. What you may not appreciate is that a big detonation of explosive at an ammo dump does not immediately involve all the munitions available. A lot of the small munitions are carried up in the cloud and fall out, detonating on their own, to provide flashes. I've seen this sort of thing with big explosions in Ukraine.
The Beirut detonation of an ammonium nitrate stockpile came much closer to simulating a nuclear explosion (suddenness, blast wave), but it was still non-nuclear.
Neutron bombs are still nuclear weapons and have all the same requirements and effects, only an augmentation of neutrons, which no camera technology can detect.
To bone up on the subject read "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glasstone and Dolan, and watch a lot of actual nuclear detonation films.