The discussion was about using this magical device to send the electromagnetic emission back at the emitter. No discussion of any actual weapon other than that. In any case, a "PCM weapon system" is imaginary. I spent decades of my career working on actual beamed weapons, which could not possibly have been directed by radar (too inaccurate)---unless they were microwave weapons. The closest to that we have are anti-drone electronic warfare systems. And, since I have the experience and expertise, I am not impressed with the "downvotes" of the ignorant.
The real reason I am downvoted around here is not because what I have to say is wrong (all the discussions end with sputtering and cursing on the other party's part) but because I am challenging ignorance and stupidity. I don't defer to them. I don't give Flat-Earthers or Moon-Hoaxers any credit, because they are simply ignorant and antagonistic to learning. (The latest nonsense is the posting of a "theory" that nuclear weapons are being used in current conflicts---when the video they show is clearly that of conventional explosions. Including the "sparkles" from delayed detonation of secondary munitions. I've seen these explosions repeatedly from coverage of Ukraine.)
You seem to want an atmosphere where everyone gets on board with the "consensus theory" of the day and doesn't rock the boat. I don't know why you would want to side up with crackpot theories and act like your own little universe of normies clinging to a "narrative". You don't like it when I kick your flimsy theories in the brisket. Asking questions is deemed virtuous, except when the questions are turned on theories. You don't bother to read any of my uplifting stuff, such as it has been, but I do get upvotes from time to time.
You want to call me a "shill" because you are also reduced to bad-mouthing. You couldn't prove I am a shill if the lives of your loved ones depended on it. It is a totally empty epithet. I know it, and you know it.
The discussion was about using this magical device to send the electromagnetic emission back at the emitter. No discussion of any actual weapon other than that. In any case, a "PCM weapon system" is imaginary. I spent decades of my career working on actual beamed weapons, which could not possibly have been directed by radar (too inaccurate)---unless they were microwave weapons. The closest to that we have are anti-drone electronic warfare systems. And, since I have the experience and expertise, I am not impressed with the "downvotes" of the ignorant.
The real reason I am downvoted around here is not because what I have to say is wrong (all the discussions end with sputtering and cursing on the other party's part) but because I am challenging ignorance and stupidity. I don't defer to them. I don't give Flat-Earthers or Moon-Hoaxers any credit, because they are simply ignorant and antagonistic to learning. (The latest nonsense is the posting of a "theory" that nuclear weapons are being used in current conflicts---when the video they show is clearly that of conventional explosions. Including the "sparkles" from delayed detonation of secondary munitions. I've seen these explosions repeatedly from coverage of Ukraine.)
You seem to want an atmosphere where everyone gets on board with the "consensus theory" of the day and doesn't rock the boat. I don't know why you would want to side up with crackpot theories and act like your own little universe of normies clinging to a "narrative". You don't like it when I kick your flimsy theories in the brisket. Asking questions is deemed virtuous, except when the questions are turned on theories. You don't bother to read any of my uplifting stuff, such as it has been, but I do get upvotes from time to time.
You want to call me a "shill" because you are also reduced to bad-mouthing. You couldn't prove I am a shill if the lives of your loved ones depended on it. It is a totally empty epithet. I know it, and you know it.