Lin wood is no good? - The Great Awakening - Where We Go Qne, We Go All!

Lin wood is no good? (twitter.com)

posted 87 days ago by AverageIdiotDoi 87 days ago by AverageIdiotDoi +32 / -1

16 comments

16 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (16)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– DagnyDocket 3 points 87 days ago +3 / -0

I have lost track of him but am intrigued. He defended Richard Jewell, suspected Olympic bomber, and there was a show made about that (Manhunt?). Believe he also defended Jon Benet Ramsay’s parents, and more recently was fired by Kyle Rittenhouse. Time will tell.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– motrhed3 3 points 87 days ago +3 / -0

from wikipedia (i know, i know, it's wikipedia...)

Wood's first libel and defamation client was Richard Jewell,[6][7][8][9] the security guard accused in the Centennial Olympic Park bombing in Atlanta in 1996. Wood sued a number of media outlets, as well as Jewell's employer. Wood reached monetary settlements from Jewell's employer, CNN, and NBC, while Time published a clarification, but paid no settlement.[28] In 2012, after fifteen years of litigation, the Georgia Supreme Court upheld trial court decisions ruling against Jewell in his libel suit against the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

he represented a plaintiff in those lawsuits, which did not turn out that well for Jewell in the long run...

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– DagnyDocket 2 points 87 days ago +2 / -0

Ahhh, thank you. Knew he was involved with him somehow.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q