Politico convinces real men everywhere to throw away their razors. Thanks Vance! - The Great Awakening

Politico convinces real men everywhere to throw away their razors. Thanks Vance! (www.politico.com) - SALT -

posted 53 days ago by Datasinc 53 days ago by Datasinc +24 / -0

12 comments

12 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (12)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– cringerepublic 3 points 53 days ago +3 / -0

According to politico, having a beard makes you an "untrustworthy aggressor" who's "less supportive of feminist causes."

Of those surveyed, 52 percent of men and 49 percent of women said they would vote for the candidate with facial hair — a figure that could make a difference in a close election. “Candidates — especially those needing to shore up support from female voters — should shave away all facial hair,” the researchers wrote at the time.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 53 days ago +1 / -0

▲ 4 ▼

– Datasinc [S] 4 points 53 days ago +4 / -0

But they are saying it, they just dug till they found some little nameless group of faggots that agreed with them 10 years ago.

"Researchers" literally means anyone asking a question to any group of people.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– deleted 2 points 53 days ago +2 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– ZerroDefex 1 point 53 days ago +1 / -0

I remember when I first grew my beard nearly 30 years ago and for a while my parents were acting like it was something controversial, you'd think I had come home with a piercing or tattoo.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q