Christians are supposed to always consider the actions of others in the most charitable light. This leads to the presumption of innocence in any legal accusation. No one is asking you to "buy" what you should be willing to give at the outset.
I guess I'm puzzled, then. It seems like the PR smear campaign is to harm RFKjr. I can credit sensing that and I agree with it, but wouldn't that be consistent with giving RFKjr the benefit of the doubt? I don't see the conflict. Am I missing something---or have I misunderstood your point?
Christians are supposed to always consider the actions of others in the most charitable light. This leads to the presumption of innocence in any legal accusation. No one is asking you to "buy" what you should be willing to give at the outset.
I guess I'm puzzled, then. It seems like the PR smear campaign is to harm RFKjr. I can credit sensing that and I agree with it, but wouldn't that be consistent with giving RFKjr the benefit of the doubt? I don't see the conflict. Am I missing something---or have I misunderstood your point?