Tina Peters responds to the sham verdict
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
I'm sorry, but a grand jury of nine voters she works for indicted her on each charge. She broke the law and it was for nothing; the recount in Mesa County did not change the results. Please read the indictment if you have not:
https://newspack-coloradosun.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Indictment.pdf
She (and Belinda Knisley) had no right to disable cameras, create a false identity to deceive other authorized personnel into thinking the surfer she invited to be there was a cybersecurity expert, admit that person to the room and allow him access to the machines. Rule of law.