Sign In or Create an Account
Looks kinda satanic.
Losing = winning
How do you introduce evidence?
You have to show the sheeple
Trump is 100% safe
He needs to set the precedent to go after [name]
The only legit one is that this will definitely energize his campaign but that’s as sugarcoated as it’s gonna get.
DC_Draino’s tweet and identical TS post are very disingenuous and a perfect example of why I don’t follow him...
He presents this as though it just happened (‘And there it is...’) when, in fact, this clip was from November 2022. Here is the C-SPAN link: https://www.c-span.org/video/?524153-1/president-biden-calls-midterm-elections-results-good-day-democracy. This exchange starts at about 25m 30s.
Biden is talking about the 2024 election and says nothing whatsoever about the charges against Trump, nor does he say at any point what DC_Draino attributes to him in quotation marks: “stop Trump from taking power again.”
You can tell that even Rogan knows he better couch this carefully (where he says the non-committal "Biden all but confirmed") so he can slither his way out of being accused of misrepresenting this clip.
Here is the transcript of the exchange:
Reporter: YOUR PREDECESSOR IS ABOUT TO LAUNCH ANOTHER CAMPAIGN. HOW DO YOU REASSURE THEM THAT IF THAT IS THE REASON FOR THE QUESTIONING, THAT THE FORMER PRESIDENT WILL NOT RETURN, THAT HIS POLITICAL MOVEMENT WILL NOT AGAIN TAKE POWER?
Biden: WELL WE JUST HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT HE WILL NOT TAKE POWER BY, IF HE DOES RUN, MAKING SURE HE, UNDER THE LEGITIMATE EFFORTS OF OUR CONSTITUTION, DOES NOT BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT AGAIN.
I get the point he's making but if it was as evidentiary as he purports it to be, he wouldn't have to use sleight of hand to make it seem so.
OK. Thank you. Appreciate it.
What is the hidden exculpatory evidence?
I think you’re on to something here… Seems totally plausible that when College Park was first platted in 1872 that the name was actually chosen because the acronym was the same as Child P@rn.
It doesn’t look like he’s talking about a previous assignment… He incorrectly paraphrases the current assignment which asks to make an argument for or against. I might think he was based if he actually took the time to understand the question before complaining to the principal. Oh but right, because he pulled at stuff like every 2 yr old does he’s actually a genius. 😂
Nena is Q
And in the process proves once again that she doesn’t understand the 1A. Wish the representatives spent the time wasted putting on this late night show on something people care about like food prices, inflation, or the border. Oh, but wait, those real issues take real thought and it’s easier to just put on this vacuous little charade.
Possibly his disdain for low-flow plumbing fixtures… “You turn on the faucet, the water doesn’t come out.”
Tell me you don't understand Social Security without telling me you don't understand Social Security.
Sorry, but this is a bit rich. He appointed three of the justices but now he's the victim? The SC wasn't too political when it overturned Roe which Trump happily took credit for but now... quite a different tune. All his tax returns are going to show is that he's more heavily leveraged than anyone knew and he's not as wealthy as he's claimed.
OMG. Some people will believe anything! So many of these supposed 'screenshots' of oops graphics are clearly manipulated in Photoshop or a similar program. This one, at least, tries to infuse some credibility through a wider view than just the screen so it looks like just a real picture of the TV. Anyone with an hour or two training in Photoshop, if that, could do this. Don't believe me? Show me ANY news network on today that doesn't have a lower third or chyron across the bottom... That's what I thought. Whoever made this didn't include that because that would make it too easy to source and see if it was real.
There's enough real shenanigans happening. Please be more discerning before getting people spun up with bogus stuff like this.
Uh oh… Flood of creepy PMs and marriage proposals incoming. 😂
Now you’re really going to confuse them. Don’t forget about the centaur. 😂
“estimated amount” + “votes calculated” + “certain amount” = made up.
I’m inclined to defer to a jury but this definitely seems like an injustice.
More clickbait from Jim Hoft. 🥱
I’m a writer and actor, I have degrees and this particular subject, I’m a professional of.
Why is this noteworthy? Clandestine what?
You don’t think it’s choreographed? Like the way the Blacks for Trump guy is strategically repositioned to be more visible halfway thru the rally or how everyone behind Trump dutifully held up their signs during the song at the end? There’s definitely some stage direction happening. Not saying that was the case with the ☝️ folks on the floor but would not be surprising at all.
OMG. Go skydiving. At 13,500 ft looking out the open door of a plane (not thru some magic fisheye airplane window lol) you can actually SEE the curvature of the earth. Or try sniper school where you need to account for the curvature of the earth or you’ll miss your target.
B...bu...bu... but 5D chess! 😂
Knowing that someone who lives in Omaha was in Washington DC on January 6th isn’t the same as knowing that someone who was near a dropbox deposited fraudulent ballots.