Unfortunately, Col. Macgregor has let his open-mindedness admit bats into his belfry. The most economical description of what Wiggington has claimed is that none of it is scientifically valid, or substantiated by anything other than ignorant speculation. One of the tipoffs of a snake-oil pitch is the assumption of a proven argument ("irrefutable", "unmistakable", etc.), which is the hallmark of the spurious climate change community. Wiggington admits no argument or doubt.
Other tipoffs are reference to the HAARP system, which is a microwave antenna pointed at the sky---in Alaska. The bottom of the ionosphere is about at 230,000 feet altitude, where the air pressure is about 0.001 psi ( air pressure at sea level is 14.696 psi). This is about 68 MILLIONTHS of an atmosphere. Roughly the amount of pressure that the blink of an eye could produce. And he is claiming that HAARP can make pressure changes? In that? Something that is practically vacuum? No scientist would sign up for that claim.
Another tipoff was reference to "chemtrails," which only illustrates Wiggington's complete ignorance about contrail formation. And a complete lack of any empirical evidence for his claims. (Yeah, there are patents galore, but I can certify from personal experience that a patent is only a documentation of a bright idea. It is by no means evidence that anything has been built or put in action.)
His discussion of the NEXRAD radars was stunningly obtuse. He made a big deal over how the NEXRAD emissions were "surrounding" the storm. Obviously. This is what happens when you superimpose a more vivid image display OVER the NEXRAD emissions that were occurring within the boundary of the storm. NEXRAD is only a surveillance radar system. Radio waves. Photons, in other words. Of very low energy apiece. I have studied the interaction of radar with aerosols by way of inventing "active chaff." No physical effects other than photon impingement. If you think photon impingement can do anything, go stand near a lit lightbulb and feel how much you are being pushed by it. Zilch. His claim that particles can be pushed around by radar is complete nonsense. But he doesn't bother to give any evidence that such particles were present, or that they are known to be responsive to radar by "pushing."
It just goes on and on. He shields himself from the fact that actual scientists would disagree with his claims by pre-emptively declaring them all to be liars.
He claims we are in danger from contamination. That should be an easy claim to substantiate. Has he written a book? I recall "Silent Spring" from Rachel Carson and the wave it made. Regrettably, it was later discovered to be bunk, because the crucial egg fragility studies were made against birds that were fed a diet deficient in calcium and phosphorus. All these odd metals...where do they come from? The fact that we receive about 50 tons/day of meteoric matter drifting down from space does not figure in his thinking.
Here is my assessment of Wiggington: Either (1) he is a certifiable paranoid psychotic with a messianic complex, or (2) he is running a very well funded propaganda effort. The more I ponder him, the more I incline to option (2). Anyone with a sincere investment in the topic would always be looking for information and insight, and would come across the scientific facts that would dispel these ideas. It would cause him to be more selective in the claims he would promote, simply out of consideration for the expense of his operations and the bad effects of credibility backlash. But, no, he is going full bore---clearly seeking to capitalize on Macgregor's audience access. Which would be not only consistent with option (2) but a very likely objective from the outset.
So, anons, you have to choose: Whether to give in to your juices and ride this horse, or to pull back and realize that Wiggington is a fraud. And frauds never mean well.
Don't put much stock in the "odds". What are the odds that a hurricane would make landfall in Puget Sound, Washington? It happened once in 1962 and another time in 1993. So, maybe every 31 years. By that logic, we are due about now...but I am not shaking in my boots. Just because something seems to happen for a first time, or in a long time, does not mean that it is in any way abnormal. (We've also had the occasional tornado, but that was about 60 years ago.) More especially, something with "low odds" is NOT impossible. Not unless the "odds" are exactly zero.
Seems most clear Dane is a CIA asset, well funded and plugged in propaganda campaigns.
Blaming HAARP is a dead giveaway this is coordinated misdirection. The fact that the sun just injected way way way way more power into the ionosphere and global circuit than HAARP could ever fathom is Conveniently Ignored by so called experts in the mainstream as well as "truther" movements.
Unfortunately, Col. Macgregor has let his open-mindedness admit bats into his belfry. The most economical description of what Wiggington has claimed is that none of it is scientifically valid, or substantiated by anything other than ignorant speculation. One of the tipoffs of a snake-oil pitch is the assumption of a proven argument ("irrefutable", "unmistakable", etc.), which is the hallmark of the spurious climate change community. Wiggington admits no argument or doubt.
Other tipoffs are reference to the HAARP system, which is a microwave antenna pointed at the sky---in Alaska. The bottom of the ionosphere is about at 230,000 feet altitude, where the air pressure is about 0.001 psi ( air pressure at sea level is 14.696 psi). This is about 68 MILLIONTHS of an atmosphere. Roughly the amount of pressure that the blink of an eye could produce. And he is claiming that HAARP can make pressure changes? In that? Something that is practically vacuum? No scientist would sign up for that claim.
Another tipoff was reference to "chemtrails," which only illustrates Wiggington's complete ignorance about contrail formation. And a complete lack of any empirical evidence for his claims. (Yeah, there are patents galore, but I can certify from personal experience that a patent is only a documentation of a bright idea. It is by no means evidence that anything has been built or put in action.)
His discussion of the NEXRAD radars was stunningly obtuse. He made a big deal over how the NEXRAD emissions were "surrounding" the storm. Obviously. This is what happens when you superimpose a more vivid image display OVER the NEXRAD emissions that were occurring within the boundary of the storm. NEXRAD is only a surveillance radar system. Radio waves. Photons, in other words. Of very low energy apiece. I have studied the interaction of radar with aerosols by way of inventing "active chaff." No physical effects other than photon impingement. If you think photon impingement can do anything, go stand near a lit lightbulb and feel how much you are being pushed by it. Zilch. His claim that particles can be pushed around by radar is complete nonsense. But he doesn't bother to give any evidence that such particles were present, or that they are known to be responsive to radar by "pushing."
It just goes on and on. He shields himself from the fact that actual scientists would disagree with his claims by pre-emptively declaring them all to be liars.
He claims we are in danger from contamination. That should be an easy claim to substantiate. Has he written a book? I recall "Silent Spring" from Rachel Carson and the wave it made. Regrettably, it was later discovered to be bunk, because the crucial egg fragility studies were made against birds that were fed a diet deficient in calcium and phosphorus. All these odd metals...where do they come from? The fact that we receive about 50 tons/day of meteoric matter drifting down from space does not figure in his thinking.
Here is my assessment of Wiggington: Either (1) he is a certifiable paranoid psychotic with a messianic complex, or (2) he is running a very well funded propaganda effort. The more I ponder him, the more I incline to option (2). Anyone with a sincere investment in the topic would always be looking for information and insight, and would come across the scientific facts that would dispel these ideas. It would cause him to be more selective in the claims he would promote, simply out of consideration for the expense of his operations and the bad effects of credibility backlash. But, no, he is going full bore---clearly seeking to capitalize on Macgregor's audience access. Which would be not only consistent with option (2) but a very likely objective from the outset.
So, anons, you have to choose: Whether to give in to your juices and ride this horse, or to pull back and realize that Wiggington is a fraud. And frauds never mean well.
Don't put much stock in the "odds". What are the odds that a hurricane would make landfall in Puget Sound, Washington? It happened once in 1962 and another time in 1993. So, maybe every 31 years. By that logic, we are due about now...but I am not shaking in my boots. Just because something seems to happen for a first time, or in a long time, does not mean that it is in any way abnormal. (We've also had the occasional tornado, but that was about 60 years ago.) More especially, something with "low odds" is NOT impossible. Not unless the "odds" are exactly zero.
Seems most clear Dane is a CIA asset, well funded and plugged in propaganda campaigns.
Blaming HAARP is a dead giveaway this is coordinated misdirection. The fact that the sun just injected way way way way more power into the ionosphere and global circuit than HAARP could ever fathom is Conveniently Ignored by so called experts in the mainstream as well as "truther" movements.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6rxTFX6q7g