The evidence shows she did do what she was accused, planning and executing a breach of election equipment.
And by breach, we are still talking about making a copy of the election machine.
It would be one thing if she said she did it as an act of civil disobedience, but she didn't.
Makes sense if she really believes that it was her duty to ensure evidence is not tampered with or to find out if Dominion was in fact tampering with the machines.
When a copy of the election machine system and passwords from her county showed up on the internet Gerald Wood was suspected of the breach because his access card was used to get into the room with the machines.
This characterisation (as used by the MSM) makes one think that the data was somehow allowed to be hacked because of the breach and it "showed up on the Internet"
In reality, it did not "show up on the Internet". It was released at Lindell's election fraud symposium, and Tina was very open about sharing her findings.
Infact, iirc it was the day she was about to travel to the symposium that her troubles started.
Who is Wood? An outside IT consultant hired by Tina Peter's. He doesn't work for the state of Colorado like other election workers. She got him an access card. But he never actually was asked to do any work and Peters took his card back. Wood also seen elsewhere at the time of the breach
You also forgot to mention a few key points about Wood.
Wood was given full immunity for turning against Tina
Wood was actually present in the Lindell Symposium and he was not some random dude who just got suckered by Tina.
Tina Peters made it public that she was going to share the findings from the backup at the symposium. So he very much knew what was going on.
Wood's answers regarding the group chat he was on Signal with was very deceptive. "I dont recall whether I was on Signal", "but the thread seems familiar".
He himself acknowledged that they approached him about preserving records. Clearly, even according to him, there was no intention to "tamper" anything - just to preserve the records.
When you look at his story, it makes no sense unless you realise he was either threatened by the FBI and so turned against her OR he was already an information
Perhaps they could just review the security cameras to see who was in the room at the time. Well, Tina Peter's actually asked them to be turned off.
Quite possibly to protect Woods, perhaps at his own request. Makes you think he was already working for the Feds.
So she set this guy up and stole this guy's identity brought an unauthorized user into the room who copied the election system data put it up on the internet.
This entire thing hinges on the testimoney of the very same guy who got full immunity.
This is why she was convicted.
All the charges she was convicted on, originates from the fact that she made a copy of the election machine, and she proved what data was being wiped out by the Dominion update. The actual counts are all related to this activity.
Even the Judge acknowledges that the thing that he is most angry about is that she gave "fodder to the election fraud conspiracy", which she damn well did.
And by breach, we are still talking about making a copy of the election machine.
Makes sense if she really believes that it was her duty to ensure evidence is not tampered with or to find out if Dominion was in fact tampering with the machines.
This characterisation (as used by the MSM) makes one think that the data was somehow allowed to be hacked because of the breach and it "showed up on the Internet"
In reality, it did not "show up on the Internet". It was released at Lindell's election fraud symposium, and Tina was very open about sharing her findings.
Infact, iirc it was the day she was about to travel to the symposium that her troubles started.
You also forgot to mention a few key points about Wood.
Wood was given full immunity for turning against Tina
Wood was actually present in the Lindell Symposium and he was not some random dude who just got suckered by Tina.
Tina Peters made it public that she was going to share the findings from the backup at the symposium. So he very much knew what was going on.
Wood's answers regarding the group chat he was on Signal with was very deceptive. "I dont recall whether I was on Signal", "but the thread seems familiar".
He himself acknowledged that they approached him about preserving records. Clearly, even according to him, there was no intention to "tamper" anything - just to preserve the records.
When you look at his story, it makes no sense unless you realise he was either threatened by the FBI and so turned against her OR he was already an information
Quite possibly to protect Woods, perhaps at his own request. Makes you think he was already working for the Feds.
This entire thing hinges on the testimoney of the very same guy who got full immunity.
All the charges she was convicted on, originates from the fact that she made a copy of the election machine, and she proved what data was being wiped out by the Dominion update. The actual counts are all related to this activity.
Even the Judge acknowledges that the thing that he is most angry about is that she gave "fodder to the election fraud conspiracy", which she damn well did.