Research Wanted: Complete Autopsy Report of THOMAS CROOKS ( 15 page PDF )
(twitter.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (86)
sorted by:
I think he was involved, but as patsy material.
You don't think he could pull this off on his own do you?
No, this was partially an inside job, lots of public pointed out the shooter on the roof and the secret service response was suppressed for minutes on end.
You've been alive long enough to be able to see a conspiracy with inside help.
Surely you're running cover.
kek
I think it was an inside job too.
I don't think it was a coincidence that Jill Biden just happened to be in Pittsburgh on the same day pulling veteran secret service agents to her detail & leaving Trump with cracker jack agents.
Good point, I had forgotten that detail.
Why was Yearick's white van there with it's Arizona plates? Why is he missing?
Why didn't the secret service have someone effectively watching that roof? It's the most obvious vantage point for a shooter.
Given that Yearick was a guy with combat experience in Ukraine, doesn't that make him fit the profile for a sniper? You prefer to think that the shooter was a 20 year old greenhorn acting on his own?
Where would Crooks get the components for the devices found in his car? Did you know that Yearick's family make explosives for the CIA in their factory in Arizona?
I think the simplest explanation is that there were several people involved and some of them were in the secret service and left room for the assassination and scuppered the response when the shooter was seen.
That means that Yearick was definitely involved and Crooks was likely involved too.
If it was Yearick who was killed on the roof, the conspirators would want to hide his CIA connections and Ukraine connections and would prefer the public to see Crooks as a lone gunman. So, this is why the autopsy might be fiddled and it's a good reason why they cremated the body quickly and outside the normal process, so the meta clues we have are for a cover-up of the shooter's identity.
If you can't admit to this possibility given all the clues, I'll assume you're running cover.
That is reasonable isn't it?