Research Wanted: Complete Autopsy Report of THOMAS CROOKS ( 15 page PDF )
(twitter.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (86)
sorted by:
You can't go by the photo of the dead shooter. I've been playing around with it using https://huggingface.co/spaces/umm-maybe/AI-image-detector . I first run the photo through as is, then I crop it in different ways and run the crops through, too. You can narrow down which parts of the photo are real and which parts are photoshopped this way. From my experimentation, it seems to indicate that the ear has been photoshopped.
You didn't get that from Jason Goodman? I thought there was a pretty reliable program to tell if a pic has been edited in PS but I don't remember the name of it. Saw on 8kun a few years ago.
Did Jason ever drop anything after all his "the ear was photoshopped" claims? That was what, 2 weeks or so ago.. or was it last week and I'm just going mental
No, I didn't get this from Jason Goodman. I found the above AI detector and have been playing around with it for awhile now. I discovered that you can find the areas that have been mostly manipulated by taking a photo, cropping it, and examining specific areas of the photo. As you narrow down areas where there is manipulation the ratio between AI and human increases.
After you play with this for awhile, you get an eye for AI, pardon the pun. 😉 This helps to speed up the process.
Would AI be detected from a photoshopped image though? Technically a PS job is a human action. I agree though if this is true it explains a LOT
"Human" just means it's an ordinary photo. "AI" seems to also include photoshopping, from my experience. Try to find a photo that you know has been photoshopped and run it through the program, as is, then crop the photo such that you include a majority of the photoshopping and see if the AI percentage goes up.