Slightly off topic, but is the person on the left that's doing sign language actually translating correctly (to anyone that knows sign language)? I always have, and still do to an extent, see that as some kind of woke pandering; are closed captions not sufficient?
And by woke pandering I just mean, I seriously doubt the people holding the press conference care about deaf people, and are just virtue signaling.
To anyone deaf, do you prefer a sign language interpreter vs closed captions?
Slightly off topic, but is the person on the left that's doing sign language actually translating correctly (to anyone that knows sign language)? I always have, and still do to an extent, see that as some kind of woke pandering; are closed captions not sufficient?
And by woke pandering I just mean, I seriously doubt the people holding the press conference care about deaf people, and are just virtue signaling.
To anyone deaf, do you prefer a sign language interpreter vs closed captions?