He might be right on this. If this was indeed the plan, it would make sense to have a candidate on the Democrat side who is about as unpopular as can be, because when they take out Trump, then they could install their own guy on the Republican side who the majority of people would rally behind. At that point, a large portion of the voting population would be "satisfied" and it would be business as usual for the Deep State.
Correct! Think about Obama vs. No Name in 2008. Then Obama vs. Romney in 2012. In both elections, the GOP candidate was a Deep State hack to make the general public think that a fair election occurred where they had a choice.
He might be right on this. If this was indeed the plan, it would make sense to have a candidate on the Democrat side who is about as unpopular as can be, because when they take out Trump, then they could install their own guy on the Republican side who the majority of people would rally behind. At that point, a large portion of the voting population would be "satisfied" and it would be business as usual for the Deep State.
Correct! Think about Obama vs. No Name in 2008. Then Obama vs. Romney in 2012. In both elections, the GOP candidate was a Deep State hack to make the general public think that a fair election occurred where they had a choice.