Suppress opposition by having protestors killed? It seems that whatever entity was involved, they were trying to build opposition to the war. In the case of Kent State, it would seem that such a shooting would INCREASE opposition to the war, which would be contrary to deep state interests, but what the Soviet Union wanted.
I wouldn't find that hard to believe. What else isn't hard to believe is there is a lot of deception, fakery, false flags, treason, infiltration, clandestine ops, secret deals made, and misleading reporting that the public never knows about. The narrative of an event seems to be settled on by the media and history books for public consumption.
Suppress opposition by having protestors killed? It seems that whatever entity was involved, they were trying to build opposition to the war. In the case of Kent State, it would seem that such a shooting would INCREASE opposition to the war, which would be contrary to deep state interests, but what the Soviet Union wanted.
I wouldn't find that hard to believe. What else isn't hard to believe is there is a lot of deception, fakery, false flags, treason, infiltration, clandestine ops, secret deals made, and misleading reporting that the public never knows about. The narrative of an event seems to be settled on by the media and history books for public consumption.