Misapplication of the concept. "multiple meanings" applies specifically to Q and Q-type comms. Here, the context is 100% clear, and to stuff DJT's words here in to talking about something else, ie devolution, you have to twist the syntax and grammar. In my opinion, you are then 'forcing' the language to mean something that you want or which fits your biases, rather than taking any natural ambiguity or multiple meanings in the form of a comm.
as someone familiar with fractalization, you should realize that 'multiple meanings' is certainly not limited to Q comms.
that being said, Trump is clearly involved in the Q plan, so i'm not even sure what your take is? nowhere does it say that the concept only applies to the drops. communication happens on multiple levels simultaneously.
of course, as a generic term, 'multiple meanings' applies across the board (i.e. anywhere English is used). But on a Q-research board?
So, at GAW, I interpreted the supposition "multiple meanings" to have been put forward in the Q sense of the term.
My take here is that DJT was NOT alluding to multiple meanings, and that he was very clearly talking about the Cabal / Clique that is running the govt behind Biden. Also, I think what he said cannot (and does not) apply to Devolution).
As is so often the case, some folks are all gushing and ooohing over the "DJT is actually President" and "DJT is the CiC". As someone who follows Patel Patriot reasonably closely, I don't believe this is the case and that it is incompatible with the idea of devolution.
So the clip here starts "Who's actually President, Mr President?" and it seems to me that this is done probably deliberately to push people in to the idea that the interviewer is asking Trump "Hey, you know, Biden is a fake and you are the real president, right?" or that its some question about devolution, but I'd bet the house that Beck is asking that question in the context of "who is running the white house, if its not Biden?".
"It's a group of people, in different levels in DC, and they surround a man that was not the most capable person"
Multiple meanings? I guess I have a bias in that I am of the opinion that too many people use that as an excuse to shoehorn all sorts of content into their "oooh, secret" biases, and also that this tendency gets exploited by a lot of the grifters and scammers in the alt-sphere.
I don't see Patel patriot doing that EVER, and I find his approach and theories the most grounded.
If devolution is in play, then I think (and afaik, PP thinks this way) that it was implemented in the form of curtailing certain capacities of the potus (exec) position, and handing core, critical nation-sustaining functions over the the devo team (i.e. a certain military sector) while leaving potus (biden) as a sort of lame duck, all the while being controlled by the puppet masters who thought that they got away with the steal, but who were in fact out maneuvered, put in a box until DJT can return to the Potus position.
I guess that viewpoint frames the way I interpret this exchange between DJT and Beck, so I just do not see multiple meanings there (i.e. devolution is NOT a committee of DC folks surrounding Biden).
Multiple meanings are possible, sure, in many contexts, but to me, they have to make sense. In this case, I don't think the idea that DJT means devolution makes sense, so ... no multiple meanings for me.
Thanks for the response tho, and the push to clarify what i mean.
Misapplication of the concept. "multiple meanings" applies specifically to Q and Q-type comms. Here, the context is 100% clear, and to stuff DJT's words here in to talking about something else, ie devolution, you have to twist the syntax and grammar. In my opinion, you are then 'forcing' the language to mean something that you want or which fits your biases, rather than taking any natural ambiguity or multiple meanings in the form of a comm.
imo, of course.
as someone familiar with fractalization, you should realize that 'multiple meanings' is certainly not limited to Q comms.
that being said, Trump is clearly involved in the Q plan, so i'm not even sure what your take is? nowhere does it say that the concept only applies to the drops. communication happens on multiple levels simultaneously.
of course, as a generic term, 'multiple meanings' applies across the board (i.e. anywhere English is used). But on a Q-research board?
So, at GAW, I interpreted the supposition "multiple meanings" to have been put forward in the Q sense of the term.
My take here is that DJT was NOT alluding to multiple meanings, and that he was very clearly talking about the Cabal / Clique that is running the govt behind Biden. Also, I think what he said cannot (and does not) apply to Devolution).
As is so often the case, some folks are all gushing and ooohing over the "DJT is actually President" and "DJT is the CiC". As someone who follows Patel Patriot reasonably closely, I don't believe this is the case and that it is incompatible with the idea of devolution.
So the clip here starts "Who's actually President, Mr President?" and it seems to me that this is done probably deliberately to push people in to the idea that the interviewer is asking Trump "Hey, you know, Biden is a fake and you are the real president, right?" or that its some question about devolution, but I'd bet the house that Beck is asking that question in the context of "who is running the white house, if its not Biden?".
"It's a group of people, in different levels in DC, and they surround a man that was not the most capable person"
Multiple meanings? I guess I have a bias in that I am of the opinion that too many people use that as an excuse to shoehorn all sorts of content into their "oooh, secret" biases, and also that this tendency gets exploited by a lot of the grifters and scammers in the alt-sphere.
I don't see Patel patriot doing that EVER, and I find his approach and theories the most grounded.
If devolution is in play, then I think (and afaik, PP thinks this way) that it was implemented in the form of curtailing certain capacities of the potus (exec) position, and handing core, critical nation-sustaining functions over the the devo team (i.e. a certain military sector) while leaving potus (biden) as a sort of lame duck, all the while being controlled by the puppet masters who thought that they got away with the steal, but who were in fact out maneuvered, put in a box until DJT can return to the Potus position.
I guess that viewpoint frames the way I interpret this exchange between DJT and Beck, so I just do not see multiple meanings there (i.e. devolution is NOT a committee of DC folks surrounding Biden).
Multiple meanings are possible, sure, in many contexts, but to me, they have to make sense. In this case, I don't think the idea that DJT means devolution makes sense, so ... no multiple meanings for me.
Thanks for the response tho, and the push to clarify what i mean.