Doesn't it seem strange to be off on the murder count by 1,699 and then we see a Q post that speaks directly to the Oath of Office that all members of the FBI must take before serving?
When asked where the requirement that all law enforcement officers take an oath to support and defend the Constitution comes from, some have speculated that it is linked to the presidential oath found in the Constitution.3 They reason that because the president is the chief executive and law enforcement officers are generally seen as members of the executive branch of government, the requirement to take an oath is inferred from Article II of the Constitution. Others assume that it comes from statutes enacted by Congress and the various state legislatures. Most are surprised to learn that the requirement to take an oath is found in the Constitution itself.Article VI mandates that both federal and state officers of all three branches of government (legislative, executive, and judicial) take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States.
Also, there is a missing "e" in JFK - "Secret Socities"
Doesn't it seem strange to be off on the murder count by 1,699 and then we see a Q post that speaks directly to the Oath of Office that all members of the FBI must take before serving?
Article
Link in Q Post 1699
https://www2.fbi.gov/publications/leb/2009/september2009/oath.htm
u/#q1699
Also, there is a missing "e" in JFK - "Secret Socities"
All Q posts with [e] here, https://qalerts.app/?q=%5Be%5D
I like it.
and I agree ... the 1699 number is too exact for our government. has to be a white hat message.
But for the hired guns of the municipalities the requirement to take an oath to the Constitution is missing.
1699 is awfully close to 17 hundred murders.