It wasn't a personal question either. Just wondering what might be the spirit behind such a rule.
Obvious one is not to influence the voters. But the voters are influenced and gaslighted every minute outside of the polling station, especially by democrats. Feels like such rules are written by the democrats - "we worked so hard to program the sheeple. Don't ruin it at the last minute"!
Polls used to be rowdy with a lot of free beer and such. They had gangs to intimidate people voting for the other party,right at the polling place. Certain people had trouble voting in the south......
I see. I've never been to polling booths personally, in my life! Never was interested in politics. I got forced into getting involved after the scamdemic came out. That smelled completely fishy and led me to a rabbit hole which blew my mind about the illusory bubble that we were brainwashed to live in.
But still... intimidation and bullying is one thing since that equates to forcing an opinion on another without consent, but silently wearing political signs is another thing which is basic principles of 1st amendment. Controllers always take it to the extremes, don't they?
I would feel uncomfortable for sure, just as I feel watching the clown world news gas lighting and government continuously lying and destroying the country. But that would not change my vote since nobody can see whom I am voting for. We can't prohibit them doing their clownery, they shouldn't suppress our right to express.
Using the same logic of "laws applying to everyone", they muzzled us, masked us and shot deadly toxic cocktail up in our veins (not me, of course) in the name of "protecting everyone from deadly virus". Same way, they confiscated our guns in the name of "guns lead to violence". None of these including the one in context above is in the best interest of the citizens. Its always towards protecting them and their narratives.
If one can be easily influenced merely by someone holding a specific political sign or flag, they shouldn't be allowed to vote, IMHO. Such vote should be made illegal, honestly - since it is not based on informed consent. Random votes are useless and can create a huge havoc in our systems. Only qualified voters should be allowed to vote after taking an exam to qualify. Mere voter Id and citizenship are not sufficient if their minds are so weak and they are too lazy to do at least some basic investigations on the candidates they are voting for.
It wasn't a personal question either. Just wondering what might be the spirit behind such a rule.
Obvious one is not to influence the voters. But the voters are influenced and gaslighted every minute outside of the polling station, especially by democrats. Feels like such rules are written by the democrats - "we worked so hard to program the sheeple. Don't ruin it at the last minute"!
Polls used to be rowdy with a lot of free beer and such. They had gangs to intimidate people voting for the other party,right at the polling place. Certain people had trouble voting in the south......
Laws were passed to clean things up.
I see. I've never been to polling booths personally, in my life! Never was interested in politics. I got forced into getting involved after the scamdemic came out. That smelled completely fishy and led me to a rabbit hole which blew my mind about the illusory bubble that we were brainwashed to live in.
But still... intimidation and bullying is one thing since that equates to forcing an opinion on another without consent, but silently wearing political signs is another thing which is basic principles of 1st amendment. Controllers always take it to the extremes, don't they?
How would you like to vote were everyone has kamala shirt and signs on that work their or work in that building,and hanging around?
Laws need to be simple and apply to everyone,to work as intended,....
I would feel uncomfortable for sure, just as I feel watching the clown world news gas lighting and government continuously lying and destroying the country. But that would not change my vote since nobody can see whom I am voting for. We can't prohibit them doing their clownery, they shouldn't suppress our right to express.
Using the same logic of "laws applying to everyone", they muzzled us, masked us and shot deadly toxic cocktail up in our veins (not me, of course) in the name of "protecting everyone from deadly virus". Same way, they confiscated our guns in the name of "guns lead to violence". None of these including the one in context above is in the best interest of the citizens. Its always towards protecting them and their narratives.
If one can be easily influenced merely by someone holding a specific political sign or flag, they shouldn't be allowed to vote, IMHO. Such vote should be made illegal, honestly - since it is not based on informed consent. Random votes are useless and can create a huge havoc in our systems. Only qualified voters should be allowed to vote after taking an exam to qualify. Mere voter Id and citizenship are not sufficient if their minds are so weak and they are too lazy to do at least some basic investigations on the candidates they are voting for.