The Balfour Declaration
"Dear Lord Rothschild:
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet:
His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non- Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours,
Arthur James Balfour"
This letter to Lord Rothschild, by the British Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour, was aimed at Jewish support for the Allies in the First World War. The letter, known as *the "Balfour Declaration" became the basis movement to create a Jewish state in Palestine. The letter was published a week later in The Times of London,
Foreign Office November 2nd, 1917
WHO do/did the Rothschilds worship?
For or against humanity?
Thinking logically?
I personally couldn't care less about other's opinions, but it really chaps my ass to see Digital Soldiers, whose assignment it is the THINK LOGICALLY, taking positions that they clearly have not thought all the way through.
Few talk about God here more than I do.
This is not the 'Israel' of the Bible as you know it.
Now friends you're either awake, you're a shill, or you're still asleep. Which is it?
'[Israel] for last.'
If you don't know how to down-vote this post let me help…
Click the bars at the top left.
Click settings.
Set "community styling" to "off".
Click "SAVE" at the bottom.
WWG1WGA!
Edit: the entire point is that if you support the political Zionists, you are supporting a construct that is inseparable from the Rothschilds.
The Weimar, yes. Hitler, NO. If what you claim were true, then Operation Barbarossa would NOT have been undertaken. The function of Barb was to deplete a quite well equipped and supplied Russian army before it could mount an invasion of Europe. Hitler was NOT khazar.
Lots of WW2 events make no sense and are likely false/modified history. A short list:
False history likely written as it was happening just like right now. Outright lies by media companies so they can reference their lies later as “evidence”. Not a single true article from NYT or WaPo since 2016 (same perpetrators of the 1924-1945 false history). 8 years of “false history” already recorded if we cannot take them over and correct the narrative.
Operation Barbarossa: if you dig around a lot among declas docs from Europe, since the fall of USSR, you'll find a different story. Events/actions leading up to Barbarossa indicate, or state outright, that Barbarossa was the main purpose of WWII, on the Hitler side. "One day, the world will know what we did here. Not for Germany, but for all of Europe." at Stalingrad. "We weren't fighting for Germany. We fought for all of Europe, to stop the bolsheviks from invading." A WWII German veteran to a Polish WWII veteran.
The function was planned during the 1920s, to bring Hitler to power with authoritarian control in Germany. The purpose was to rebuild Germany's military might enough to prevent the overrun of Europe by the bolsheviks, whose controlling powers were intent on spreading communism into all of Europe. To that end, Stalin was building a formidable military (the msm, being controlled by those who back bolsheviks, said otherwise). Once that military was built and deployed such that the invasion could take place, it would have, and Europe would become communist. Operation Barbarossa was launched a few months, about 6, before the bolsheviks could assemble their forces. Documents from the KGB indicate that was the plan, to overrun Europe. IMO, Hitler was instructed to launch Barbarossa before the bolsheviks were quite ready.
Note that Pearl occurred AFTER Barbarossa was launched. The bolsh then knew that the US HAD to enter WWII; otherwise, Germany could have possibly destroyed the bolsheviks entirely. Instead, Germany was forced to fight on three fronts, depleting their materials/manpower such that they couldn't concentrate on the east. FDR was, in fact, a tool of the bolshevik. Read bolshevik as Khazar (j e w). That last is also in the docs from the old USSR.
Very interesting. I did notice that both Hitler and THEN Stalin both steamrolled the same path through Ukraine both going into the USSR (Nazi Army) and then coming back into Europe (Soviet Army). It does seem odd that the historical homeland of the European bankers got demolished twice by entities supposedly under their control. Build back better with a new population that steals all the now vacant land? Still unclear whether that is the good guys or bad guys doing it.
Land that is "vacant" for some period of time can be legally transferred to new "occupiers" per common/international law from what I understand. Seems like that is what Israel has been doing in order to "legally" change the land ownership.
Hitler's front was pretty widespread, but yes, he did. According to docs and interviews (from WWII soldiers and vets), the function Hitler had to accomplish was depletion of war resources in Russia. It's interesting to note, from line pictures, that Russia had armor that was quite superior to Germany, especially heavy tanks. One pic was of a disabled Russian heavy surrounded by 10 Panzers, with a couple more a ways away. All Panzers had been destroyed. This sort of thing is what Europe would have faced in the event Stalin had been able to mount an invasion. There is no possible way it could have been stopped.
As to Stalin's entry, to him and the bolsheviks it didn't matter. Recall that in the early 1930s was the man made famine, done purposely by Stalin et al. The function of that was the removal of as many white Russians as possible, through starvation. Many of the rest were removed to gulags in Siberia.