This is a long, detailed scientific report with dozens of references and much technical information. On the other hand, much of it is quite readable for the general public.

And it is DAMNING. This will surely be one of the exhibits used at the trials of those who designed and carried out this enterprise of mass-murder upon the world.

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/111/344

. . . All of this amounts to a worldwide iatrogenic event—the kind caused by clinicians supposedly trying to make things better—that has already killed 0.213 ± 0.006% of the world's population (1 death per every 470 living people) and all of this has occurred in less than 3 years. During that same time the ineffectiveness of the injections has become evident, because they did not prevent any deaths (Rancourt, Baudin, Hickey& Mercier, 2023a). In the meantime, an alarming and growing number of adverse reactions associated with theCOVID-19 vaccines, have been recorded in several databases of adverse effects of vaccines around the world. Among them, a flawed but nonetheless indicative system, is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) of the United States (Open VAERS, 2024; for its gross underreporting of injuries, see research by Lazarus et al., 2010)

. . . However, study of the worldwide mortality statistics showed that the disease and death toll for COVID-19 was comparable to prior flu seasons up to the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines that began in December 2020 (Beattie, 2021; Servín de la Mora Godinez, 2023a, 2023b; Rancourt, Baudin & Mercier, 2023b). After that rollout began, the fear of Seneff &Nigh (2021) that the vaccines would be “Worse than the Disease” was borne out. Just after the rollout, and especially with the boosters, as Beattie, Rancourt, and others would show, death rates greatly increased worldwide and did reach into the millions.

[long snip, including much statistical and technical data, charts, and so on]

Conclusions

Based on the identification and ranges of the quantities of the chemical elements discovered, and on the physical and chemical characteristics of the content of the vaccines studied, it is of utmost importance to highlight the great similarity that exists between the products of the different brands. The observed differences in chemical elements found in the different brands, we believe, are due to the time lapse between drawing of samples on account of the changing structure of the self-assembling entities in the fluids contained in the vials. We do not believe the observed differences are because of manufacturing processes specific to any given brand or to differences between lots because of stochastic variations in the production processes. Despite the small size and few samples analyzed in this exploratory study, we believe that analysis of a larger number of samples and lots will confirm the trends we have pointed out. We believe that the various and diverse pathologies in the inoculated population are not due to fortuitous problems in manufacturing or distribution, but rather to the technology that seems to be common to all these products which appear to be universally harmful to humans.