While I agree XRP has always been a product of the Deep State and was intended from the beginning to be their vehicle into the WEF's new financial system, I'm not sure the lawsuit is intended to get support from Trump.
Instead, I think it is meant to legally establish the bounds of what a cryptocurrency will have to meet in order to be considered acceptable as a currency. This lawsuit will solidify their power to claim that a public, distributed cryptocurrency like BTC is merely a commodity/property, while XRP will be legislated, adopted and regulated as a "real" currency.
That position has been known/expected since at least 2017, when XRP began seriously courting central banks.
My only question is: what is Trump's real vision for crypto? Is he genuinely willing to let the public decide what we want to use for money, even if that means the governments of the world may lose control? Or is he going to cave to siren call of keeping control to make sure it doesn't go in a way of which he disapproves?
The hardest thing for any CEO is to turn over control of a company you have built to someone else who may not share your values. If he really lets the public decide, we may not make the choice he would prefer.
While I agree XRP has always been a product of the Deep State and was intended from the beginning to be their vehicle into the WEF's new financial system, I'm not sure the lawsuit is intended to get support from Trump.
Instead, I think it is meant to legally establish the bounds of what a cryptocurrency will have to meet in order to be considered acceptable as a currency. This lawsuit will solidify their power to claim that a public, distributed cryptocurrency like BTC is merely a commodity/property, while XRP will be legislated, adopted and regulated as a "real" currency.
That position has been known/expected since at least 2017, when XRP began seriously courting central banks.
My only question is: what is Trump's real vision for crypto? Is he genuinely willing to let the public decide what we want to use for money, even if that means the governments of the world may lose control? Or is he going to cave to siren call of keeping control to make sure it doesn't go in a way of which he disapproves?
The hardest thing for any CEO is to turn over control of a company you have built to someone else who may not share your values. If he really lets the public decide, we may not make the choice he would prefer.