Did Elon Musk really purchase Twitter or was it seized under executive order 13818? - The Great Awakening

185

Did Elon Musk really purchase Twitter or was it seized under executive order 13818? (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 31 days ago by DarQ2light 31 days ago by DarQ2light +186 / -1

49 comments download

49 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (49)

sorted by:

▲ 11 ▼

– 45-4KAG 11 points 31 days ago +11 / -0

I've always thought this. The way they got rid of Jack. And Elon does government contracts. But Elon could have easily read the Q posts. 🤷‍♀️

I just went over to qagg and searched for "let that sink in", and got post 621 from 01/27/18. Elon walked into twitter headquarters on 10/27/22 with a sink (ignore zeros and have 127). I searched qagg for all posts on 01/27/18. Some seem very relevant.

https://qagg.news/?q={d%201/27/2018%20}&q2=

permalink save report block reply

▲ 7 ▼

– MAGA_Patriot_1776 7 points 31 days ago +7 / -0

u/#LetTheSinkIn

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– Monomial 4 points 31 days ago +4 / -0

Hmm...interesting. Possibly not related, but I was just noticing:

621 - "Let that sink in"
622 - "Black Forest" - A region in SW Germany, containing, among other things, The Devil's Ground (Teufels grund), an ancient flourite mine which has a "Stollen" (an adit)
623 - The drop "Who owns Twitter"

All these on Jan. 27 within 8 hours of each other. Seems like there could be a relationship here. At least something intriguing enough to merit further reflection.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q