First of all, the bullet holes were in the front and back windows. Second, his head could have been turned when the glass went flying, or he could have ducked after the first shot and got cut on subsequent shots. You get a clear look at his head a few times. He did not get shot in the head.
Never heard of the guy. Here's what Perplexity AI had to say:
Q: Is Evo Morales more of a Gloablist or an Anti-Globalist?
A: Evo Morales, Bolivia's former president, is generally considered to be more of an anti-globalist figure, particularly in his opposition to neoliberal economic policies and U.S. influence. However, his stance is nuanced and complex. Here's an analysis of Morales' position:
Anti-Globalist Tendencies
Critique of Neoliberalism: Morales consistently criticized capitalism, neoliberalism, and international institutions like the IMF and World Bank[1]. He viewed these as instruments of imperialism and recolonization, particularly in Latin America.
Opposition to U.S. Influence: Morales sought to reduce U.S. influence in Bolivia, opposing American intervention in areas like drug trafficking and economic policy[1]. He scaled back Bolivia's dependence on the World Bank and IMF[4].
Indigenous Rights and Anti-Imperialism: As the first Indigenous president of Bolivia, Morales positioned himself within a broader Indigenous movement, aiming to "right the wrongs of 500 years" of colonialism[1]. He championed Indigenous concerns in his foreign policy.
Resource Nationalism: Morales increased taxation on the hydrocarbon industry and moved towards nationalizing key sectors of the economy, including mining, electricity, and telecommunications[4].
Nuanced Approach to Globalization
Selective Engagement: While opposing certain aspects of globalization, Morales did not entirely reject engagement with the global economy. Many Indigenous Bolivians supported participation in global markets while opposing the neoliberal agenda that privileged elites[2].
Regional Alliances: Morales built relationships with leftist governments in Latin America, particularly Venezuela and Cuba, and joined the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas[4]. This suggests a preference for regional cooperation over broader global integration.
Economic Pragmatism: Despite his anti-globalist rhetoric, Morales oversaw strong economic growth and moved Bolivia towards a mixed economy rather than completely rejecting global economic engagement[4].
Domestic Complexities
Regional Divide: Bolivia's response to globalization is complicated by regional differences. While some highland indigenous communities contest aspects of the neoliberal global economy, many in the lowland mestizo areas embrace opportunities from global economic participation[2].
Balancing Act: Morales had to navigate tensions between promoting extractivist policies to drive economic growth and maintaining the interests of his Indigenous and peasant constituency[1].
In conclusion, while Evo Morales is primarily known for his anti-globalist stance, particularly in opposition to U.S.-led neoliberal policies, his approach to globalization was more nuanced in practice. He selectively engaged with global and regional economic systems while attempting to protect Bolivia's sovereignty and Indigenous interests.
Driver gets shot in the head; keeps driving.
I think it was glass fragments that got him.
in the back of his head?
First of all, the bullet holes were in the front and back windows. Second, his head could have been turned when the glass went flying, or he could have ducked after the first shot and got cut on subsequent shots. You get a clear look at his head a few times. He did not get shot in the head.
Oh :^)
also looks like a hit to the right side of chest
Never heard of the guy. Here's what Perplexity AI had to say: Q: Is Evo Morales more of a Gloablist or an Anti-Globalist?
A: Evo Morales, Bolivia's former president, is generally considered to be more of an anti-globalist figure, particularly in his opposition to neoliberal economic policies and U.S. influence. However, his stance is nuanced and complex. Here's an analysis of Morales' position:
Anti-Globalist Tendencies
Critique of Neoliberalism: Morales consistently criticized capitalism, neoliberalism, and international institutions like the IMF and World Bank[1]. He viewed these as instruments of imperialism and recolonization, particularly in Latin America.
Opposition to U.S. Influence: Morales sought to reduce U.S. influence in Bolivia, opposing American intervention in areas like drug trafficking and economic policy[1]. He scaled back Bolivia's dependence on the World Bank and IMF[4].
Indigenous Rights and Anti-Imperialism: As the first Indigenous president of Bolivia, Morales positioned himself within a broader Indigenous movement, aiming to "right the wrongs of 500 years" of colonialism[1]. He championed Indigenous concerns in his foreign policy.
Resource Nationalism: Morales increased taxation on the hydrocarbon industry and moved towards nationalizing key sectors of the economy, including mining, electricity, and telecommunications[4].
Nuanced Approach to Globalization
Selective Engagement: While opposing certain aspects of globalization, Morales did not entirely reject engagement with the global economy. Many Indigenous Bolivians supported participation in global markets while opposing the neoliberal agenda that privileged elites[2].
Regional Alliances: Morales built relationships with leftist governments in Latin America, particularly Venezuela and Cuba, and joined the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas[4]. This suggests a preference for regional cooperation over broader global integration.
Economic Pragmatism: Despite his anti-globalist rhetoric, Morales oversaw strong economic growth and moved Bolivia towards a mixed economy rather than completely rejecting global economic engagement[4].
Domestic Complexities
Regional Divide: Bolivia's response to globalization is complicated by regional differences. While some highland indigenous communities contest aspects of the neoliberal global economy, many in the lowland mestizo areas embrace opportunities from global economic participation[2].
Balancing Act: Morales had to navigate tensions between promoting extractivist policies to drive economic growth and maintaining the interests of his Indigenous and peasant constituency[1].
In conclusion, while Evo Morales is primarily known for his anti-globalist stance, particularly in opposition to U.S.-led neoliberal policies, his approach to globalization was more nuanced in practice. He selectively engaged with global and regional economic systems while attempting to protect Bolivia's sovereignty and Indigenous interests.
Citations: [1] https://works.swarthmore.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1170&context=suhj [2] https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/345084441.pdf [3] https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/evo-morales-stays-power/ [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evo_Morales [5] https://www.theglobalist.com/where-socialism-appears-to-work-a-close-up-look-at-evo-morales/ [6] https://oxfordre.com/latinamericanhistory/abstract/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.001.0001/acrefore-9780199366439-e-503? d=%2F10.1093%2Facrefore%2F9780199366439.001.0001%2Facrefore-9780199366439-e-503&p=emailAe4XAkmRmU2.k [7] https://www.cetri.be/From-Running-Joke-to-Role-Model?lang=fr [8] https://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/17/world/bolivia-s-poor-proclaim-abiding-distrust-of-globalization.html
That's why Pinochet preferred taking commies on helicopter rides.
Reminds me of another former head of state being assassinated in Japan. It's another threat to President Trump by the Deep State
FOEMER president as well, not even in power anymore...
twstalker - https://twstalker.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1850617166950731929
voanews: Bolivia's ex-President Morales claims his car was shot at in attempted assassination
DailyMail: Former Bolivian president Evo Morales 'survives assassination attempt after unidentified men open fire on his car'