So the feminism movement went off the rails pretty damn fast, but it did start from a good position, I think. When a woman is mostly dependent on the men in her life, that puts her in a very vulnerable position if there doesn't happen to be any good men for her to rely on. I had an aunt who was married to an alcoholic, and some of the stories she told me were pretty damn bad. He wasn't even a man who would become violent when he drank, but he used all their money on alcohol, to the point they had problems getting enough food, and they had 3 sons. The worst years for her were late 1940s, after the war, and 1950s.
And as far as I understand that was one of the early reasons why some women started to advocate for women to get an education and jobs of their own.
Now I think it would be good if we could get more mothers back home, but what if the husband turns out bad?
How would you solve this?
You are not going to get kneejerkers to realize that "feminism" was an (((operation))) to work further dygenics on women who were staggering around because they had lost FOUR GENERATIONS of men who were the fruit of their generations.
I.e., the war drafts and wars from 1915 to the 1980s. War draft deliberately selected for healthy, strong, brave, intelligent men OF PRIME BREEDING AGE. The chads. And war draft deliberately Passovered 4Fs--sickos, crazies, homosexuals, cowards, etc.
Women didn't undergo a similar culling, but women were left to hold things together...left with a reduced and degraded and traumatized pool of mates to choose from. And without the fruit-of-their-generation young men taking the reins of power, who took the reins?
Your basic kneejerker on this topic has nothing but a bunch of slogans and bromides to offer. They do not understand the utter depravity and degree of the dysgenic war that has gone on for at least 100 years.
When the "women's march" of January 2017 happened, I was utterly horrified at what I was seeing. I knew there were a lot of walking wounded women staggering around, searching for chads who never got born because their forefathers had gotten slaughtered, but I had no idea how terribly bad it had gotten. Women demanding they not be sexually objectified...dressing up as genitals. Women demanding that the tall, blonde, blue eyed, rich, successful man who vanquished their Queen take them as effectively war trophies ("Grab this!") etc.
I grew up among strong women who worked as tradeswomen (welders, sheet metal workers, shipfitters) and also raised the kids, kept house, etc. Some had real a-holes as husbands. Some had good men. But I can tell you this (early GenX)--------they all voted against the Equal Rights Amendment, recognizing it as a deliberate effort to drive wedges between working/middle class men and women.
100% spot on analysis
Thank you.
But dear God how I wish it were wrong...............
I see this at the heart of the whole race-mixing thing as well. Women literally haunted by the ghosts of Chads never born...having to settle for less...mad in a way they cannot define/no one presents them with reflection.
Such an egregious violation of every instinct...then they are presented with the fantasy that egregious violation of whatever instincts they have left IS VIRTUE. The more they hurt themselves, the more virtuous they are.
i have seen the race mixing issue as a scam on women. First the t.v. shows from a young age show friendly, happy, cool, and loveable minority groups. In person interaction also plays out on gender lines; black males are always polite, friendly, and good natured when dealing with women... but when black male interacts with white male, it's different, and common for the most trivial encounters to be contentious, and aggression is always a possibility. White males are unsure why white females are unable to see and refuse to admit reality. Anyone who doesn't see that Hollywood and media are weaponised against humanity isn't worth fighting for.
Yes.
The thing I have found hardest to live with during my oldfag life (early GenX) is having a sense of the depths and detail the weaponized media have on how people's hearts and minds work. Not only do they know what different people's "buttons" are, they install other buttons to be able to push them later. I was trained in all that (to my surprise; it's not why I chose the field I chose), and I learned all I could and left, to try to teach others how this stuff works, and how to protect against it.
I have ranted most of my adult life on the topic of the wounding and disruption of American men...but I have a similar sad concern about American women. I think the two groups' wounds are a bit different, though all trace back to what I wrote about earlier (the genocidal demographic disruption, particularly of nearly the entire 20th century).
Those weaknesses/injuries have been very useful soil bed for the demon seeds of the media.
Every day God confronts me with my own limits as I see these walking wounded women, lashing out at the very things they most want but cannot find, and my own reaction is negative, hateful, etc. That woman shrieking at the child in the stroller...others have used that as a meme, a hateful symbol, whatever. But I also saw a female so brutally ripped from her own roots as a woman and potential mother, I had to close my eyes and restore my center. Soul murder is lucrative, and I wish that the people who are constantly bashing on about "pro life" would develop a more Christlike understanding of how it could possibly be that mothers could reject their own offspring (which of course is related to them rejecting the male that seeded the pregnancy, but that's a different topic).
Thank you, A-A.