I've been giving this a lot of thought. I just don't see another cheat being effective. Too hard to quickly and easily pin down decisively. I don't see that swaying many who are still voting for Harris. However, Trump wins decisively and the Dems then go about a non peaceful transfer of power, I think THAT would open eyes! Way more eyes than another steal. Also, Q didn't specify "worldwide" precipice. I think if the Dems precipitate Civil War by refusing to honor the clear will of the people, that could be rather precipicey for many.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
That's not how controlled opposition works. EVERYTHING meaningful that we have ever experienced on this planet for the past 150 years (I think a lot longer, but I'm not making that case) has been controlled opposition (not counting hopefully Q). There has been nothing organic that was big enough to be noticed by a meaningful number of people. Anything they don't want doesn't make it outside of local news. They contrive a ton of elaborate events, controlling entities seemingly at odds on the world stage (almost all major ones), but even those things that arise organically are completely controlled. When you control ALL information (which they do), you ensure that the reports of events you want get espoused and controlled, the stories you don't want get nixed. Any thing that accidentally gets through gets memory holed. If you have heard of it, it was intentional, no matter what "side" you think it was on. That means that if there has been a situation anywhere on this planet for the past century plus, where you think two entities have been at odds, they haven't been.
This conclusion is part of my report. It's far from done yet. I hope to put out the rest which will make the full case for this conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt. Nevertheless, the first part which is out shows how the economic part (and to some extent the information part) of that system was originally constructed by Rockefeller/Rothschild.
Controlled Opposition looks IN EVERY WAY like real opposition. If it did not, it wouldn't be very convincing. Most people involved as controlled opposition are unaware that they are, but some are. In addition to complete control of information, there are spies everywhere: and I mean everywhere (by "spy" I mean someone acting against their apparent intent).
And while you may not appreciate me saying it, if Q is a controlled opposition agency, then Trump is a knowing one as well. A person acting against their apparent intent happens all the time (notably spies, actors, politicians, sales people, etc.). Trump is an actor, salesman, politician, and a master of Kayfabe. It is entirely possible for him to be acting different than apparent intent. I'm not saying I think so, I am only saying, from all I've seen, he's got the ability.